Cited by 9Infection Control and VentilationOccupational Health and PerformanceOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

Performance Evaluation of Full Facepiece Respirators with Cartridges

Open access
Lee, Shu-An, Chen, Yen-Lung, Hwang, Dong-Chir, Wu, Chih-Chao, Chen, Jen-Kun·2017·Aerosol and Air Quality Research

Abstract

Full facepiece respirators (FFRs) with charcoal cartridges are very common wearable devices for industrial or military purposes preventing respiratory tract, face, eyes, and mouth from hazards exposure. However, related research for performance evaluation was rare. We aimed to use a self-developed testing system investigating (1) filtration efficiency (FE) of aerosols in charcoal cartridges; (2) breakthrough time of cyclohexane in charcoal cartridges; (3) fit factors (FFs) and (4) protection factors (PFs) of FRRs. The results showed that FE of charcoal cartridges against 0.3 µm of sodium chloride (NaCl) and dioctyl phthalate (DOP) particles under 85 L min–1 were 99.93% and 99.89%, respectively, which did not meet the standard 99.97% regulated for filters such as P100 and HEPA. As for 42.5 L min–1 condition (dual canisters), the FE against NaCl (99.97%) did meet the requirement set for HEPA (99.97%); however, that against DOP (99.95%) failed to meet the standard. In addition, the breakthrough time of 3000ppm cyclohexane was 31 min under 32 L min–1, which was longer than the 30 min standard described in CNS6636 Z2023 and JIS8152. As to the results of fit test among 21 subjects, only 1 failed to meet the requirement (fit factor = 500) and the average of fit factors was 8342 ± 5892. The mean value of protection factors was 112.3 ± 54.6 while 3 users had lower PFs than the assigned protection factor (APF = 50) regulated by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). APFs obtained for particles less than 100 nm were smaller than the APF standard regulated by OSHA, indicating APF standards may be overestimated for such particle size. Therefore, users should be aware of potential risks caused by such substances in nano-sized scale (e.g., nanoparticles or viruses) when wearing FFRs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4209/aaqr.2016.11.0485

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A moderate correlation between FFs and PFs was also found for N95 FFRs against airborne irons in the welding workplace (Han, 2002); EN-specified FFP respirators and surgical masks against NaCl aerosols (Lee et al., 2016); and full facepiece respirators with HEPA filters (Lee et al., 2017).

    “A moderate correlation between FFs and PFs was also found for the following: N95 FFRs against airborne irons in the welding workplace (Han, 2002); EN-specified FFP respirators and surgical masks against NaCl aerosols (Lee et al., 2016); full facepiece respirators with HEPA filters (Lee et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, S.-A., Chen, Y.-L., Hwang, D.-C., Wu, C.-C., & Chen, J.-K.
Affiliations
  • Feng Chia University (TW)
  • National Health Research Institutes (TW)
Venue
Aerosol and Air Quality Research
Published
2017
Volume
17
Issue
5
Pages
1316-1328
ISSN
  • 1680-8584 (ISSN-L)
  • 2071-1409
OpenAlex
W2614803735
Cited by
8
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-sa
Locations
Aerosol and Air Quality Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Council
  • National Health Research Institutes (NHRI‐BN‐105‐PP‐27)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Infection Control and Ventilation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
filtration efficiency, breakthrough time, cyclohexane, fit factor, protection factor, aerosol filtration, nanoparticle protection, respirator fit testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review