Cited by 171Nutrition and Health in AgingMuscle Physiology and DisordersHormonal and reproductive studies

Pharmacological interventions for treatment of sarcopenia: Current status of drug development for sarcopenia

Open access
Kwak, Ju Yeon, Kwon, Ki-Sun·2019·Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research

Abstract

Sarcopenia, the loss of skeletal muscle mass and function with age, was first recognized as a disease in the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) (M62.84) and has recently attracted attention as aged populations increase. However, the diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia remain controversial and there are as yet no US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for sarcopenia. Given that both intrinsic and extrinsic factors contribute to sarcopenia onset and development, understanding the mechanism of sarcopenia is important for the development of therapeutic strategies. In this review, we described a variety of drugs for sarcopenia under investigation, including myostatin/ActR2 signaling inhibitors, exercise mimetics, anabolic hormones, and natural compounds. However, the combination of non-drug therapies with exercise and nutritional supplements are also needed as more easily accessible intervention strategies against sarcopenia rather than pharmacological treatments alone. Many approaches to develop therapeutic methods to overcome sarcopenia may lead to healthy aging.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4235/agmr.19.0028

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kwak, J. Y., & Kwon, K.-S.
Affiliations
Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (KR)
Corresponding author
Kwon, Ki-Sun
Venue
Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research
Published
2019-09-30
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
98-104
ISSN
  • 2508-4798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2508-4909
OpenAlex
W2953709313
Cited by
171
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • KRIBB Repository (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
sarcopenia, pharmacotherapy, drug development, exercise mimetics, anabolic hormones, natural compounds, healthy aging, skeletal muscle atrophy, dietary supplements, exercise therapy, sarcopenia diagnostic criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review