Cited by 11Media and Digital CommunicationDigital Marketing and Social MediaTechnology Adoption and User Behaviour

The Usage Behaviors, Motivations and Gratifications of Using User-Generated Media: The Case Study of Taiwan’s YouTube

Open access
Wang, Tai-Li·2014·Advances in Journalism and Communication

Abstract

Video sharing websites have become an indispensable online service to Internet users. We aim to investigate the relationships between motivations of using video-sharing websites, online reputation management, innovation orientation, and video-sharing website usage behaviors, and how these factors affect gratification obtained from video-sharing website usage. This study employs focus group interviews and online questionnaire surveys. The research findings reveal that the higher the interpersonal media related motivations, such as participating or sharing, the higher the level of involvement of video-sharing website usage behaviors is. However, the mass media related motivations, such as browsing or consuming, are irrelevant to the level of usage involvement. The earlier users adopt video-sharing websites, the higher level of usage involvement is. The more value video-sharing websites’ users put for video sites’ performance perception, the lower level of usage involvement is; on the contrary, the more value video-sharing websites’ users put for impression management, the higher level of usage involvement is. Taken as a whole, the higher level of usage involvement, the higher level of gratifications acquired from using user-generated video-sharing websites is. This paper establishes a comprehensive behavior model of video-sharing websites, which is helpful both for online media research and business practice. It is worthy of noting that the findings are based on survey data from a single country, and may impact this paper’s external validity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4236/ajc.2014.24015

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Media use in the context of UGM is different from traditional media use and even Internet use in general because UGM involves content creation and audience participation.

    “Besides, we echo past research (e.g: [72] [73] [23] ) that claim media use in the context of UGM is different from traditional media use and even Internet use in general because UGM involves content creation and audience participation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Czerwinski, & D. S. Lund (Chair), Shared Authoring. Meeting of Proceedings of the 2008 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI, 2008), Florence, 9 April 2008, 1111-1120.
  2. Hsiao, M. C. (1998). An Exploratory Study of Taiwan College Students' Internet Using Behaviors, Motivations, Gratification Levels, and Internet Addiction. Master's Thesis, Hsinchu: Department of Communication, Chiao-Tung University.
  3. Kao, N. Y. (2006). Uses and Gratifications Theory on Web 2.0 Application-A Case of Online Video Sharing Websites. Master's Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
  4. Lee, F. C. (2008). The Motivations and Identification of New Internet Media Users-A Case Study of Video Blog. Master's Thesis, Taipei: Chinese Culture University.
  5. Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
  6. Tsai, C. R. (2007). The Study of User Gratification for Participators of Online Video Sharing Websites. Master's Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan Normal University.
  7. Tsai, P. R., Tsai, C. C., Xie, T., & Chen, J. J. (2006). The Factors Affecting Students' Use of Video Blog in Taipei. Master Thesis, Taipei: National Taiwan University of Arts.
  8. Ye, J. S. (2007). The Study of Service Quality and Gratification of Audio Video Web-Use YouTube and Noname Blog as Examples. Master Thesis, Taipei: Chinese Culture University.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T.-L.
Affiliations
National Taiwan University (TW)
Corresponding author
Wang, Tai-Li
Venue
Advances in Journalism and Communication
Published
2014
Volume
02
Issue
04
Pages
137-150
ISSN
  • 2328-4927 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-4935
OpenAlex
W2022145989
Cited by
11
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Advances in Journalism and Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
Keywords
user-generated media, online video platforms, YouTube, usage behavior, user motivation, gratification, online reputation management, impression management, innovation orientation, user participation, performance perception, user adoption, behavior models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review