Cited by 93Transportation and Mobility InnovationsTransportation Planning and OptimizationElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure

Shared Autonomous Vehicles as a Sustainable Solution to the Last Mile Problem: A Case Study of Ann Arbor-Detroit Area

Moorthy, Aditi, De Kleine, Robert, Keoleian, Gregory, Good, Jeremy, Lewis, Geoff·2017·SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Electronic and Electrical Systems

Abstract

The problem of accessibility to public transit is well-documented in transportation theory and network literature, and is known as the last mile problem. A lack of first and last mile transit services impairs access to public transit causing commuters to opt for private modes of transit over public modes. This paper analyzes the implications of a shared autonomous vehicle (AV) taxi system providing last mile transit services in terms of environmental, cost, and performance metrics. Conventional public transit options and a hypothetical last-mile shared autonomous vehicle (SAV) system are analyzed for transit between Ann Arbor and Detroit Wayne County Airport for life cycle energy, emissions, total travel time, and travel costs. In the case study, energy savings from using public transit options with AV last mile service were as high as 37% when compared to a personal vehicle option. Energy and greenhouse gas burdens were very sensitive to vehicle powertrain and ridership parameters. The results suggest that an AV taxi service providing last-mile transit services could enhance the sustainability of transit by influencing a mode shift from private modes to public modes of transit. Wait times associated with public transit options, as well as high AV technology costs, could be obstacles for a last mile service.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4271/2017-01-1276

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moorthy, A., De Kleine, R., Keoleian, G., Good, J., & Lewis, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Ford Motor Company
Venue
SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Electronic and Electrical Systems
Published
2017-03-28
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
328-336
ISSN
  • 1946-4614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-4622
OpenAlex
W2586864967
Cited by
93
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
SAE International journal of passenger cars. Electronic and electrical systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Michigan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Keywords
shared autonomous vehicles, public transport accessibility, life cycle energy, greenhouse gas emissions, travel time, travel cost, modal shift, drivetrain, ridership, sustainable transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review