Cited by 31Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPleural and Pulmonary DiseasesGynecological conditions and treatments

Thoracic and diaphragmatic endometriosis: Single-institution experience using novel, broadened diagnostic criteria

Open access
Larraín, Demetrio, Suárez, Francisco, Braun, Hernán, Chapochnick, Javier, Diaz, Lidia, Rojas, Iván·2018·Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association

Abstract

Objective: To describe our experience with the multidisciplinary management of both thoracic/diaphragmatic endometriosis (TED), applying a broadened definition of the “Thoracic endometriosis syndrome (TES)” to define cases. Material and Methods: We present a retrospective series of consecutive patients affected by pathology-proven TED, treated at our institution, during a period of 7 years. Results: Five women were included. Two patients were referred due to catamenial chest/shoulder pain, one due to recurrent catamenial pneumothorax, and one due to new-onset diaphragmatic hernia. One patient had no thoracic symptoms, but diaphragmatic endometriosis was found during gynecologic laparoscopy for pelvic endometriosis. Endometriosis was histologically confirmed in all cases. After follow-up, all patients remain asymptomatic. Conclusion: Broadened TES criteria could increase the incidence of TED and determine better knowledge of this condition. Multidisciplinary, minimally invasive surgery is effective and safe, but should be reserved for tertiary referral centers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4274/jtgga.2018.0035

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larraín, D., Suárez, F., Braun, H., Chapochnick, J., Diaz, L., & Rojas, I.
Affiliations
Clinica Santa Maria (CL)
Corresponding author
Larraín, Demetrio
Venue
Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association
Published
2018-08-06
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
116-121
ISSN
  • 1309-0380 (ISSN-L)
  • 1309-0399
OpenAlex
W2806001679
Cited by
31
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
thoracic endometriosis, diaphragmatic endometriosis, thoracic endometriosis syndrome, diagnostic criteria, catamenial pneumothorax, diaphragmatic hernia, minimally invasive surgery, multidisciplinary management, pelvic endometriosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review