Cited by 22Endometriosis Research and TreatmentPleural and Pulmonary DiseasesGynecological conditions and treatments

Diaphragmatic endometriosis and thoracic endometriosis syndrome: A review on diagnosis and treatment

Soares, Thiers, Oliveira, Marco Aurelio, Panisset, Karen, Habib, Nassir, Rahman, Sara, Klebanoff, Jordan S., Moawad, Gaby N.·2022·Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Endometriosis of the diaphragm has been gaining more attention in the practice of gynecologists and thoracic surgeons in recent years. Understanding related symptoms and developing imaging methods have improved their approach. A review of the literature was performed with the aim to report on incidence, diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of diaphragmatic endometriosis. We also cover the issue of the Thoracic Endometriosis Syndrome (TES). Complaints of cyclic chest pain in patients of childbearing age should have as differential diagnosis the presence of thoracic endometriosis. Catamenial pneumothorax is the main manifestation of diaphragmatic endometriosis and Thoracic Endometriosis Syndrome. Other possible manifestations are hemothorax, pulmonary nodules, and diaphragmatic hernia. Despite the possibility of drug treatment, many patients will be submitted to surgical treatment. The minimally invasive approach should be the one of choice. The robotic pathway allows for an easier approach due to its ability to articulate robotic arms, allowing the treatment of lesions in hard-to-reach locations, such as the posterior part of the diaphragm. Multidisciplinary treatment should be used in most cases, as only abdominal approach is not sufficient for the diagnosis and treatment of lesions in the thoracic cavity. The approach of endometriosis of the diaphragm and Thoracic Endometriosis Syndrome should be multidisciplinary, allowing the improvement of quality of life in most patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1515/hmbci-2020-0066

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soares, T., Oliveira, M. A., Panisset, K., Habib, N., Rahman, S., Klebanoff, J. S., & Moawad, G. N.
Affiliations
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , State University of Rio de Janeiro , Rio de Janeiro , Brazil
  • Universidade Federal Fluminense (BR)
  • Université Paris Cité (FR)
  • George Washington University Hospital (US)
  • Main Line Health (US)
Corresponding author
Moawad, Gaby N.
Venue
Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation
Published
2021-02-18
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
137-143
ISSN
  • 1868-1883 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-1891
OpenAlex
W3130143100
Cited by
22
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hormone Molecular Biology and Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pleural and Pulmonary Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
Keywords
diaphragmatic endometriosis, thoracic endometriosis syndrome, catamenial pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary nodules, diaphragmatic hernia, minimally invasive surgery, robotic surgery, multidisciplinary treatment, diagnosis, prognosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review