Cited by 54Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityTechnology Use by Older Adults

Electronic tracking for people with dementia who get lost outside the home: a study of the experience of familial carers

White, Eleanor Bantry, Montgomery, Paul, McShane, Rupert·2010·British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

Purpose: The study aimed to elicit a description of GPS (global positioning system) tracking use in the care of people with dementia in domestic settings and to generate hypotheses about impact. Procedures: Users were recruited through a commercial provider. Qualitative interviews with 10 carers were completed to generate an in-depth description of how the devices were used and the perceived impact. A questionnaire was administered to ascertain sample characteristics. Findings: Most carers preferred to use tracking as a back-up to other strategies of management, particularly supervision by a carer and locked doors. In cases where the carers perceived the risk of harm from getting lost to be low, tracking was used to preserve the independence of the person with dementia. The carers reported that tracking gave them reassurance and also enhanced the sense of independence both for themselves and for the person with dementia. The poor reliability of the device was identified as a substantial limitation. Conclusion: Larger studies are needed to assess the safety and clinical value of GPS tracking. These should explore the views of people with dementia. Assessment tools are needed to assess suitability. Occupational therapy can play a pivotal role in this process of intervention design, assessment and evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4276/030802210x12706313443901

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
White, E. B., Montgomery, P., & McShane, R.
Affiliations
  • University College Cork (IE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Corresponding author
White, Eleanor Bantry
Venue
British Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2010-04
Volume
73
Issue
4
Pages
152-159
ISSN
  • 0308-0226 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-6006
OpenAlex
W2320244118
Cited by
54
References
40
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
GPS tracking, dementia, wandering, getting lost, family caregivers, caregiver experiences, device reliability, independence, supervision, locked doors, occupational therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review