Cited by 558Workplace Health and Well-beingHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionPhysical Activity and Health

Financial impact of health promotion programs, a comprehensive review of the literature

Aldana, Steven G.·2001·American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to summarize the literature on the ability of health promotion programs to reduce employee-related health care expenditures and absenteeism. SEARCH PROCESS: Using key words in a literature-searching program, a comprehensive search was conducted on the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, HealthSTAR. SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, SciSearch, ERIC, and ABI Inform. STUDY INCLUSION AND EXCLUSION CRITERIA: All data-based studies that appeared in peer reviewed journals in the English language. Theses, dissertations, or presentation abstracts that were not published in peer reviewed journals were excluded. The initial search identified 196 studies, but only 72 met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: Summary tables were created that include design classification, subject size, results, and other key information for each study. DATA SYNTHESIS: Both the nature of the findings and the overall quality of the literature were evaluated in an attempt to answer two questions: Do individuals or populations with high health risks have worse financial outcomes than individuals or populations with low health risks? Do health promotion programs improve financial outcomes? MAJOR CONCLUSIONS: There are good correlational data to suggest that high levels of stress, excessive body weight, and multiple risk factors are associated with increased health care costs and illness-related absenteeism. The associations between seat belt use, cholesterol, diet, hypertension, and alcohol abuse and absenteeism and health care expenditures are either mixed or unknown. Health promotion programs are associated with lower levels of absenteeism and health care costs, and fitness programs are associated with reduced health care costs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4278/0890-1171-15.5.296

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aldana, S. G.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Corresponding author
Aldana, Steven G.
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2001-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
296-320
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W2177023033
Cited by
558
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 41
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
health promotion programs, employee health, health care expenditure, absenteeism, workplace wellness, health risk factors, stress, body weight, fitness programs, cost reduction
MeSH terms
Absenteeism, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Cost Control, Health Expenditures, Health Promotion, Health Services Research, Humans, Occupational Health Services, United States, Program Evaluation, Employer Health Costs, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review