Cited by 30Infant Development and Preterm CareNeonatal Respiratory Health ResearchRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Experiences of caregivers of infants who have been on bubble continuous positive airway pressure at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Malawi: A descriptive qualitative study

Open access
Gondwe, Mtisunge Joshua, Gombachika, Belinda, Majamanda, Maureen D.·2017·Malawi Medical Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An innovative, low-cost bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) device has recently been introduced in Malawi for the treatment of respiratory distress in infants. While this novel bCPAP system has been shown to be safe and effective in reducing infant mortality, caregivers' experiences have not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to explore experiences of parents and guardians of infants who had been on bCPAP at Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH) in Blantyre, Malawi. METHODS: This was a descriptive phenomenological study that was carried out at the Chatinkha nursery unit and the paediatric nursery ward at QECH, from January to February 2015. Purposive sampling was used to select participants for in-depth interviews. Data saturation was reached with 12 caregivers. Data were analysed using Colaizzi's framework. RESULTS: Caregivers received inadequate, inconsistent, and sporadic information about bCPAP. Student nurses and doctors were best able to answer caregivers' questions and concerns. When their infants were on bCPAP, caregivers felt anxious and fearful. However, upon implementation of bCPAP treatment for their children, the caregivers were satisfied with it. The main sources of psychological stress were limited parent-child interaction and the constraints of prescribed visiting hours. Family, friends, and caregiver involvement in the care of infants provided some psychological comfort. CONCLUSIONS: The results show gaps in the information and psychological support that mothers of infants on bCPAP receive in hospital. We recommend that psychological support be given to the mothers of infants on bCPAP at QECH.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4314/mmj.v29i1.2

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fuhrman BP, Zimmerman JJ.Pediatric critical care: expert consult premium. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2011.
  2. Ertmann RK, Reventlow S, Söderström M. Is my child sick? Parents management of signs of illness and experiences of the medical encounter. Scand J Prim Health Care 2011; 29: 23-27.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gondwe, M. J., Gombachika, B., & Majamanda, M. D.
Affiliations
University of Malawi (MW)
Corresponding author
Gondwe, Mtisunge Joshua
Venue
Malawi Medical Journal
Published
2017-05-03
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
5
ISSN
1995-7262 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2611523878
Cited by
30
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 11
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Malawi Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
bubble continuous positive airway pressure, infant respiratory distress, caregiver experiences, parents and guardians, psychological stress, parental anxiety, information provision, psychological support, family involvement in care, visiting hours, low-cost medical device, Malawi
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Child, Fear, Female, Humans, Infant, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Malawi, Male, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Qualitative Research, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review