Preventing and Controlling Foodborne Disease in Commercial and Institutional Food Service Settings: A Systematic Review of Published Intervention Studies
Open accessAbstract
This study reviews the current literature on behavioral and environmental food safety interventions conducted in commercial and institutional food service settings. A systematic search of the published literature yielded 268 candidate articles, from which a set of 23 articles reporting intervention outcomes was retained for evaluation. A categorization of measured outcomes is reported; studies addressed multiple outcomes ranging from knowledge, attitudes, and behavior of personal hygiene and food safety to management practices and disease rates and outbreaks. This study also investigates the quality of reported research methods used to evaluate the effectiveness of the interventions, using a nine-point quality index adapted by the authors. The observed scores suggest that there are opportunities to improve the design and reporting of research in the field of foodborne disease prevention as it applies to food safety interventions that target the food service industry. The aim is to aid researchers in this area to design higher quality studies and to produce clearer and more useful reports of their research. In turn, this can help to create a more complete evidence base that can be used to continually improve interventions in this domain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Knowledge is probably easier to measure than attitude or practice.
“This result is consistent with previous studies [58,107], and a significant amount of information is available, so it is probably easier to measure knowledge than attitude or practice.”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Food Safety and Hygiene Training on Food Handlers (2020) · cites this paper as [107]
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of its Applications to Health-Related Behaviors
Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996) · American Journal of Health Promotion · doi:10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87 · Cited by 3,185 · see citing works
Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: An extension of the CONSORT statement
Zwarenstein, M., Treweek, S., Gagnier, J. J., Altman, D. G., Tunis, S., Haynes, B., Oxman, A. D., Moher, D., & groups, F. T. C. A. P. T. I. H. (. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a2390 · Cited by 1,813 · see citing works
Evaluation of the food safety training for food handlers in restaurant operations
Park, S.-H., Kwak, T.-K., & Chang, H.-J. (2010) · Nutrition Research and Practice · doi:10.4162/nrp.2010.4.1.58 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Meta-analysis of food safety training on hand hygiene knowledge and attitudes among food handlers
SOON, J. M., BAINES, R., & SEAMAN, P. (2012) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-502 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Evaluation of a food hygiene training course in Scotland
Ehiri, J. E., Morris, G. P., & McEwen, J. (1997) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/s0956-7135(97)00005-4 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
The hygiene training of food handlers at a teaching hospital
Acikel, C. H., Ogur, R., Yaren, H., Gocgeldi, E., Ucar, M., & Kir, T. (2008) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.03.008 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Intervention improves restaurant employees' food safety compliance rates
York, V. K., Brannon, L. A., Shanklin, C. W., Roberts, K. R., Barrett, B. B., & Howells, A. D. (2009) · International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management · doi:10.1108/09596110910955703 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Insfran-Rivarola, A., Tlapa, D., Limon-Romero, J., Baez-Lopez, Y., Miranda-Ackerman, M., Arredondo-Soto, K., & Ontiveros, S. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9091169 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
- Authors
- Viator, C., Blitstein, J., Brophy, J. E., & Fraser, A.
- Affiliations
- RTI International (US)
- Clemson University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Viator, Catherine
- Venue
- Journal of Food Protection
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 446-456
- ISSN
- 0362-028X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2326335266
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Food Protection (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (2011-68003-30395)
- Clemson University
- RTI International
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture (2011‐68003‐30395)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Keywords
- foodborne illness prevention, food safety interventions, institutional food service, food service industry, personal hygiene, foodborne outbreak, intervention effectiveness
- MeSH terms
- Food Handling, Foodborne Diseases, Food Services, Humans, Publishing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review