Cited by 127Food Safety and HygieneInfection Control in HealthcareSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology

Meta-analysis of food safety training on hand hygiene knowledge and attitudes among food handlers

Open access
SOON, JAN MEI, BAINES, RICHARD, SEAMAN, PHILLIP·2012·Journal of Food Protection

Abstract

Research has shown that traditional food safety training programs and strategies to promote hand hygiene increases knowledge of the subject. However, very few studies have been conducted to evaluate the impact of food safety training on food handlers' attitudes about good hand hygiene practices. The objective of this meta-analytical study was to assess the extent to which food safety training or intervention strategies increased knowledge of and attitudes about hand hygiene. A systematic review of food safety training articles was conducted. Additional studies were identified from abstracts from food safety conferences and food science education conferences. Search terms included combinations of "food safety," "food hygiene," "training," "education," "hand washing," "hand hygiene," "knowledge," "attitudes," "practices," "behavior," and "food handlers." Only before- and after-training approaches and cohort studies with training (intervention group) and without training (control group) in hand hygiene knowledge and including attitudes in food handlers were evaluated. All pooled analyses were based on a random effects model. Meta-analysis values for nine food safety training and intervention studies on hand hygiene knowledge among food handlers were significantly higher than those of the control (without training), with an effect size (Hedges' g) of 1.284 (95% confidence interval [CI] ∼ 0.830 to 1.738). Meta-analysis of five food safety training and intervention studies in which hand hygiene attitudes and self-reported practices were monitored produced a summary effect size of 0.683 (95% CI ∼ 0.523 to 0.843). Food safety training increased knowledge and improved attitudes about hand hygiene practices. Refresher training and long-term reinforcement of good food handling behaviors may also be beneficial for sustaining good hand washing practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-11-502

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The summarized effect size for attitude was SMD = 0.28, suggesting a moderate effect for positive attitude of food handlers.

    “Considering the summarized effect size, a SMD = 0.28 suggests a moderate effect for the positive attitude of food handlers; this is similar to previous studies [57,58,66].”

    From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Food Safety and Hygiene Training on Food Handlers (2020) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Synthesis of results reports a summary effect size of 0.683 (95% CI 0.523–0.843) for hand hygiene attitudes and self-reported practices, not 0.28. The paper supports an improvement in attitudes, but its reported summary estimate contradicts the number attributed to it. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The only meta-analysis of interventions to train food handlers found trained handlers had around 30% improvement in knowledge over controls (n = 9 studies) and 70% improvement in practices, but this was based on self-reported practices, which are prone to exaggeration.

    “However, the only meta-analysis of interventions to train food handlers, found trained handlers had around 30% improvement in knowledge over controls (n = 9 studies) and 70% improvement in practices, but this was based on self-reported practices, which are prone to exaggeration [106].”

    From Food Safety in Low and Middle Income Countries (2015) · cites this paper as [106]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Knowledge is probably easier to measure than attitude or practice.

    “This result is consistent with previous studies [58,107], and a significant amount of information is available, so it is probably easier to measure knowledge than attitude or practice.”

    From A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Food Safety and Hygiene Training on Food Handlers (2020) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Data analysis section reports knowledge data from nine studies versus attitude data from five. The Discussion notes bias in self-reported attitudes and the complexity of monitoring behavior. These observations are consistent with the citing sentence’s tentative inference, but the paper does not state that knowledge is easier to measure than attitude or practice. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Further evidence of the effects of training interventions on the knowledge, attitudes and practices toward food safety and hygiene of food handlers from different processes along the food supply chain is needed.

    “Despite the effort made [57,58], further evidence of the effects of training interventions on the knowledge, attitudes and practices toward food safety and hygiene of food handlers from different processes along the food supply chain is needed.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cooper, H., and L. V. Hedges. 2009. Research synthesis as a scientific enterprise, p. 3-14. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, and J. C. Valentine (ed.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta- analysis. Russell Sage, New York.
  2. Higgins, J. P., and S. Green (ed.). 2011. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, vers. 5.1.0. (Updated March 2011.) The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://www. cochrane-handbook.org/. Accessed 4 October 2011.
  3. Mathiasen, L. 2004. Evaluating the effectiveness of food safety messages along the agri-food chain from farm to fork. M.S. dissertation. University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
  4. M.S. thesis. State University of New York, Buffalo.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SOON, J. M., BAINES, R., & SEAMAN, P.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Malaysia Kelantan (MY)
  • Royal Agricultural University (GB)
Corresponding author
SOON, JAN MEI
Venue
Journal of Food Protection
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
75
Issue
4
Pages
793-804
ISSN
0362-028X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2328770276
Cited by
127
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Food Protection (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
Keywords
food safety training, hand hygiene, food handlers, hand washing, knowledge, attitudes, food handler education, refresher training, food handling behavior
MeSH terms
Workforce, Food Handling, Food Services, Hand Disinfection, Health Education, Humans, Hygiene, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Personnel Management, Food Safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review