Cited by 125Food Safety and HygieneHuman Resource Development and Performance EvaluationPublic Health Policies and Education

Evaluation of a food hygiene training course in Scotland

Ehiri, J.E., Morris, G.P., McEwen, J.·1997·Food Control

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0956-7135(97)00005-4

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ehiri, J. E., Morris, G. P., & McEwen, J.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Corresponding author
Ehiri, J.E.
Venue
Food Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-06
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
137-147
ISSN
0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111041414
Cited by
125
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Food Control (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
food hygiene training, food safety management, training effectiveness, food hygiene knowledge, cross-contamination, food storage, temperature control, high-risk foods, environmental health, Scotland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review