Maxillary reconstruction with subperiosteal implants in a cancer patient: A one-year follow-up
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: To describe a clinical case on cancer patient with ablative tumor surgery, from treatment planning, surgical resection and subsequent implantological rehabilitation. Case Report: A 61-year-old male, diagnosed with a squamous cell carcinoma in the maxilla, requires the removal of the lesion and corresponding oral rehabilitation. However, two surgeries were necessary to rehabilitate the upper jaw. A custom-made prosthesis was fabricated. It was made from sintered titanium using machined subperiosteal implants with a universal external connection. Finally, a milled cobalt- chrome structure was produced and a feldspar ceramic covering was subsequently applied. Conclusions: Oral rehabilitation, oral cancer, subperiostal implants.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These features, along with cranial base anchorage, make the IPS Implants® Preprosthetic a unique dental rehabilitation device for stable restoration in complex cases, distinguishing it from other subperiosteal implants, particularly those produced by laser melting technology.
“These features, along with cranial base anchorage, make the IPS Implants® Preprosthetic a unique dental rehabilitation device for stable restoration in complex cases, distinguishing it from other subperiosteal implants, particularly those produced by laser melting technology [25–32].”
From Innovative landing zones for one-piece, rigidly fixated patient-specific subperiosteal implants in dental rehabilitation of severe maxillary and midfacial defects (2025) · cites this paper as [29]
The Case Report describes a customised subperiosteal implant supporting dental restoration in a complex cancer case, and the Discussion reports no operational or prosthetic complications after one year. The paper does not identify IPS Implants® Preprosthetic, describe cranial-base anchorage, or establish that it is unique or distinct from laser-produced implants. The cited passages have no page numbers in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
2 retracted
Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants
Esposito, M. A., Murray-Curtis, L., Grusovin, M. G., Coulthard, P., & Worthington, H. V. (2007) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003815.pub3 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
RetractedInterventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants
Esposito, M. A., Ardebili, Y., & Worthington, H. V. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003815.pub4 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
RetractedJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
(2020) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0278-2391(20)30250-0 · Cited by 803 · see citing works
The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review
Joda, T., Zarone, F., & Ferrari, M. (2017) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0415-0 · Cited by 424 · see citing works
Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study
Imburgia, M., Logozzo, S., Hauschild, U., et al. (2017) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-017-0383-4 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Fibula free flap: a new method of mandible reconstruction.
Hidalgo, D. A. (1989) · PubMed · Cited by 333 · see citing works
Dental implants in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Srinivasan, M., Meyer, S., Mombelli, A., & Müller, F. (2016) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/clr.12898 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Lim, G. L., Lin, G., Monje, A., et al. (2017) · The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants · doi:10.11607/jomi.5581 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Oral rehabilitation with dental implants in irradiated patients: a meta-analysis on implant survival
Schiegnitz, E., Al‐Nawas, B., Kämmerer, P. W., & Grötz, K. A. (2013) · Clinical Oral Investigations · doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1134-9 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Mangano, C., Bianchi, A., Mangano, F. G., Dana, J., Colombo, M., Solop, I., & Admakin, O. (2020) · 3D Printing in Medicine · doi:10.1186/s41205-019-0055-x · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Cerea, M., & Dolcini, G. A. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/5420391 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Kokosis, G., Schmitz, R., Powers, D. B., et al. (2016) · Archives of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.5999/aps.2016.43.1.3 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Barone, A. A., Ricci, M., Mangano, F. G., et al. (2011) · Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.joms.2011.01.014 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Cohen, D. J., Cheng, A., Kahn, A., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep20493 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
A 41‐year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant
Schou, S., Pallesen, L., Hjørting-Hansen, E., et al. (2000) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.110210.x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Moore, D. J., & Hansen, P. A. (2004) · Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.018 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
The rehabilitation of oral defects by osseointegrated implants
van Steenberghe, D., Brånemark, P., Quirynen, M., et al. (1991) · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.1991.tb02321.x · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Linkow, L. I. (2000) · Journal of Oral Implantology · doi:10.1563/1548-1336(2000)26 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant
Schou, S., Pallesen, L., Hjørting-Hansen, E., et al. (2000) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011002171.x · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [3]Weiss CM Reynolds T A collective conference on the utilization of subperiosteal implants in implant dentistry J Oral Implantol 2000 26 127 8 11831330
- [4]Linkow LI Use of a tripodal mandibular subperiosteal implant with ramus hinges for facial asymmetry J Oral Implantol 2000 26 120 3 11831328
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exceptional Cases Demand Exceptional Personalized Solutions: The Next Level in Dental Rehabilitation
Gellrich, N.-C., Korn, P., Jehn, P., Neuhaus, M., Lentge, F., & Rahlf, B. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14030294 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Gellrich, N.-C., Korn, P., Jehn, P., Lentge, F., Neuhaus, M.-T., & Rahlf, B. (2025) · Head & Face Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13005-025-00549-y · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Garrido-Martínez, P., Quispe-López, N., Montesdeoca-García, N., Esparza-Gómez, G., & Cebrián-Carretero, J.
- Affiliations
- Hospital La Luz (ES)
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry
- Publisher
- Medicina Oral, S.L.
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e293-e297
- ISSN
- 1989-5488 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8916599
- OpenAlex
- W4214552513
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4
- FWCI
- 5.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Keywords
- maxillary reconstruction, subperiosteal implants, oral cancer, maxillary squamous cell carcinoma, oral rehabilitation, custom-made prosthesis, cobalt-chromium framework, one-year follow-up
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review