The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gas transfer velocities of CO2 in three European estuaries (Randers Fjord,Scheldt, and Thames)
Open accessAbstract
We measured the flux of CO 2 across the air‐water interface using the floating chamber method in three European estuaries with contrasting physical characteristics (Randers Fjord, Scheldt, and Thames). We computed the gas transfer velocity of CO2 (k) from the CO 2 flux and concomitant measurements of the air‐water gradient of the partial pressure of CO 2 (pCO 2). There was a significant linear relationship between k and wind speed for each of the three estuaries. The differences of the y‐intercept and the slope between the three sites are related to differences in the contribution of tidal currents to water turbulence at the interface and fetch limitation. The contribution to k from turbulence generated by tidal currents is negligible in microtidal estuaries such as Randers Fjord but is substantial, at low to moderate wind speeds, in macrotidal estuaries such as the Scheldt and the Thames. Our results clearly show that in estuaries a simple parameterization of k as a function of wind speed is site specific and strongly suggest that the y‐intercept of the linear relationship is mostly influenced by the contribution of tidal currents, whereas the slope is influenced by fetch limitation. This implies that substantial errors in flux computations are incurred if generic relationships of the gas transfer velocity as a function of wind speed are employed in estuarine environments for the purpose of biogas air‐water flux budgets and ecosystem metabolic studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean
Wanninkhof, R. (1992) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/92jc00188 · Cited by 4,737
A cubic relationship between air‐sea CO2 exchange and wind speed
Wanninkhof, R., & McGillis, W. R. (1999) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/1999gl900363 · Cited by 674
Cited by
Future ocean acidification will be amplified by hypoxia in coastal habitats
Melzner, F., Thomsen, J., Koeve, W., Oschlies, A., Gutowska, M. A., Bange, H. W., Hansen, H. P., & Körtzinger, A. (2013) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-012-1954-1 · Cited by 501
Do we have enough pieces of the jigsaw to integrate CO2 fluxes in the coastal ocean?
Borges, A. V. (2005) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02732750 · Cited by 414
Self-citationThe cycle of nitrogen in river systems: sources, transformation, and flux
Xia, X., Zhang, S., Li, S., Zhang, L., Wang, G., Zhang, L., Wang, J., & Li, Z. (2018) · Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts · doi:10.1039/c8em00042e · Cited by 258
Soulet, G., Hilton, R. G., Garnett, M. H., Dellinger, M., Croissant, T., Ogrič, M., & Klotz, S. (2018) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-15-4087-2018 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Borges, A. V., Delille, B., Schiettecatte, L., Gazeau, F., Abril, G., & Frankignoulle, M.
- Venue
- Limnology and Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1630-1641
- ISSN
- 0024-3590 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-5590
- OpenAlex
- W2175267031
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gas transfer velocities of CO2 in three European estuaries (Randers Fjord,Scheldt, and Thames). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4319/lo.2004.49.5.1630
- The paper
- Borges, A. V., Delille, B., Schiettecatte, L., Gazeau, F., Abril, G., & Frankignoulle, M. (2004). Gas transfer velocities of CO2 in three European estuaries (Randers Fjord,Scheldt, and Thames). Limnology and Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2004.49.5.1630
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.