Cited by 12Connective tissue disorders researchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesFibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research

The anxiety between individuals with and without joint hypermobility

Open access
Gurer, Gulcan, Sendur, Faruk, Gultekin, Bulent Kadri, Ozcan, Mehmet Erkan·2010·The European Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and Objectives: This study was performed to compare the anxiety disorders between individuals with and without joint hypermobility.Methods: A total of 94 Turkish volunteers, 40 subjects (38 females, 2 males) with joint hypermobility and 54 controls (47 females, 7 males) without joint hypermobility, were included in this study.We evaluated the joint hypermobility by using the Beighton scoring system in the participants and a Beighton score of at least 4 was considered as joint hypermobility.In addition, all cases were evaluated with Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale by a psychiatrist in order to define their psychyatric disorders and anxiety levels, respectively.Results: Age, gender and educational levels of the participants were similar between these two groups.Mean of anxiety score was higher statistically in the study group (13.5 ± 5.3) than that of the control group (11.1 ± 4.9) (p < 0.05).No statistically a significant difference in the ratio of psychyatric disorders according to SCID-I were observed between cases with and without hypermobility.Conclusions: Anxiety scores have been found significantly higher in the group with hypermobility than that of the group without hypermobility.We strongly recommend the assessment of medical conditions, including joint hypermobility syndrome, in anxiety patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4321/s0213-61632010000400002

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adults with asymptomatic GJH have higher anxiety scores than controls without asymptomatic GJH.

    “Adults with asymptomatic GJH had higher anxiety scores42,43 and more specific anxiety as state, trait anxiety, social anxiety, and severity of fears than controls without asymptomatic GJH.33, 34, 35, 36”

    From Role of Anxiety in Individuals with Generalized Joint Hypermobility: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    Table 3 (p. 208) reports higher mean Hamilton anxiety scores in the hypermobility group than in controls (13.5 versus 11.1; p < 0.05). Participants and Methods defines the groups by Beighton score but does not establish that the participants with hypermobility were asymptomatic, so that qualifier is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Beighton P, Grahame R, Bird H. Assessment of hy- permobility. In: Beighton P, ed. Hypermobility of joints, 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 1999. p. 9-22.
  2. First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I), Clinical Version. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press; 1997.
  3. Yazici MK, Demir B, Tanriverdi N, Karaag ˘aog ˘lu E, Yolaç P. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, study of reability and validity among raters. Turkish J Psychiatry 1998; 9: 114-117.
  4. Bulbena A, Duró JC, Porta M, Martín-Santos R, Mateo A, Molina L, et al. Anxiety disorder in the joint hy- permobility syndrome. Psychiatry Res 1993; 43: 59-68.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gurer, G., Sendur, F., Gultekin, B. K., & Ozcan, M. E.
Affiliations
Fatih University (TR)
Venue
The European Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-12
Volume
24
Issue
4
ISSN
0213-6163 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054919040
Cited by
12
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • The European Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Scientific Electronic library online (Sciences Carlos III Health Institute) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
Keywords
joint hypermobility, anxiety disorders, Beighton score, hypermobility spectrum disorders, psychiatric comorbidity, anxiety levels, Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review