Cited by 12Connective tissue disorders researchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Association between joint hypermobility and anxiety in Brazilian university students: Gender-related differences

Sanches, S.B., Osório, F.L., Louzada-Junior, P., Moraes, D., Crippa, J.A.S., Martín-Santos, R.·2014·Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Abstract

Introduction Anxiety disorders may be associated with several non-psychiatric disorders. Current literature has been investigating the association between anxiety and joint hypermobility (JHM), with special interest in non-articular symptoms that may be related to autonomic dysfunction. This study investigated the association between anxiety and JHM in a sample of Brazilian university students. Methods Data were cross-sectionally collected in two Brazilian universities (N=2600). Participants completed three validated self-rating anxiety scales: Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Social Phobia Inventory (SPIN) and the brief-version of SPIN (Mini-SPIN). They also answered the self-rating screening questionnaire for JHM: the Five-part Questionnaire for Identifying Hypermobility. Results Hypermobile women showed significantly higher scores in all the anxiety scales, when compared with men: BAI total score (t=3.77; p Conclusions The results of the present study support earlier evidence on the relationship between anxiety and JHM in women, showing specific gender-related features in this field. It also directs attention to non-articular symptoms that may be enrolled in this association.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.08.016

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanches, S. B., Osório, F. L., Louzada-Junior, P., Moraes, D., Crippa, J. A. S., & Martín-Santos, R.
Affiliations
Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
Venue
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
558-561
ISSN
0022-3999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044090744
Cited by
12
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychosomatic Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
FAPESP (2007/03685-3)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Connective tissue disorders research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
joint hypermobility, anxiety disorders, gender differences, university students, autonomic dysfunction, social anxiety disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Brazil, Female, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Students, Universities, Sex Distribution, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review