The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies
Abstract
The Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies takes a multidisciplinary approach to disability and provides an authoritative and up-to-date overview of the main issues in the field around the world today. Adopting an international perspective and consisting entirely of newly commissioned chapters arranged thematically, it surveys the state of the discipline, examining emerging and cutting edge areas as well as core areas of contention. Divided in five sections, this comprehensive handbook covers: Different models and approaches to disability How key impairment groups have engaged with disability studies and the writings within the discipline Policy and legislation responses to disability studies and to disability activism Disability studies and its interaction with other disciplines, such as history, philosophy and science and technology studies Disability studies and different life experiences, examining how disability and disability studies intersects with ethnicity, sexuality, gender, childhood and ageing. Containing chapters from an international selection of leading scholars, this authoritative handbook is an invaluable reference for all academics, researchers and more advanced students in disability studies and associated disciplines such as sociology, health studies and social work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vulnerability: new essays in ethics and feminist philosophy
(2014) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.185679 · Cited by 791
Out of Darkness into Light? Introducing the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities
Kayess, R., & French, P. (2008) · Human Rights Law Review · doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngm044 · Cited by 452
The WPA-Lancet psychiatry commission on the future of psychiatry
Bhugra, D., Tasman, A., Pathare, S., Priebe, S., Smith, S., Torous, J., Arbuckle, M. R., Langford, A., Alarcón, R. D., Chiu, H. F. K., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30333-4 · Cited by 392
Vulnerability and Human Rights
Gran, B. (2007) · Societies Without Borders · doi:10.1163/187219107x216726 · Cited by 377
Cultural Relativism and Universal Human Rights
Donnelly, J. (1984) · Human Rights Quarterly · doi:10.2307/762182 · Cited by 331
Freeman, M. C., Kolappa, K., de Almeida, J. M. C., Kleinman, A., Makhashvili, N., Phakathi, S., Saraceno, B., & Thornicroft, G. (2015) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(15)00218-7 · Cited by 307
Vulnerability: Reflections on a New Ethical Foundation for Law and Politics
Brando, N. (2015) · Cited by 217
Stein, M. A. (2017) · Nussbaum and Law · doi:10.4324/9781315090412-1 · Cited by 184
A New Human Rights Model of Disability
Degener, T. (2017) · The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43790-3_2 · Cited by 183
Madness, distress and the politics of disablement
(2015) · Bristol University Press eBooks · doi:10.1332/policypress/9781447314578.001.0001 · Cited by 165
Cited by
Mental health in elite athletes: International Olympic Committee consensus statement (2019)
Reardon, C. L., Hainline, B., Aron, C. M., Baron, D., Baum, A. L., Bindra, A., Budgett, R., Campriani, N., Castaldelli-Maia, J. M., Currie, A., et al. (2019) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2019-100715 · Cited by 1,277
Dis/entangling Critical Disability Studies
Goodley, D. (2013) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2012.717884 · Cited by 575
World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review
Federici, S., Bracalenti, M., Meloni, F., & Luciano, J. V. (2017) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2016.1223177 · Cited by 498
Provocations for Critical Disability Studies
Goodley, D., Lawthom, R., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2019) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1566889 · Cited by 406
Moral Wrongs, Disadvantages and Disability: A Critique of Critical Disability Studies
Vehmas, S., & Watson, N. (2014) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.831751 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2013-03-01
- OpenAlex
- W1531512382
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 62.60
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203144114
- The paper
- Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies. (2013). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203144114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.