Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Disability Human Rights

Open access
Stein, Michael Ashley·2017·Nussbaum and Law

Abstract

This chapter examines the theoretical implications of adding disability to the existing canon of human rights, both for individuals with disabilities and for other under-protected people. It shows that Martha Nnssbaum&s;s capabilities approach provides an especially fertile space within which to understand the content of human rights. The chapter describes the social model of disability in contrast to the medical model, and discusses its growing influence on the formation of international instruments as well as its limitations in overall human rights discourse. It explains the paradigm by integrating Nussbaum&s;s version of the capabilities approach with the social model of disability and the human right to development. The chapter considers United Nations instruments pertaining to disability, and the efforts underway to pass a convention on behalf of disabled persons. It concludes with a few thoughts on the potential consequences of viewing disability as universal to rather than abnormal from the human condition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315090412-1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Stein, M. A.
Venue
Nussbaum and Law
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2017-07-05
Pages
3-49
OpenAlex
W1481903985
Cited by
184
References
0
FWCI
97.79
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disability Human Rights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315090412-1
The paper
Stein, M. A. (2017). Disability Human Rights. Nussbaum and Law. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315090412-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.