The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disability Human Rights
Open accessAbstract
This chapter examines the theoretical implications of adding disability to the existing canon of human rights, both for individuals with disabilities and for other under-protected people. It shows that Martha Nnssbaum&s;s capabilities approach provides an especially fertile space within which to understand the content of human rights. The chapter describes the social model of disability in contrast to the medical model, and discusses its growing influence on the formation of international instruments as well as its limitations in overall human rights discourse. It explains the paradigm by integrating Nussbaum&s;s version of the capabilities approach with the social model of disability and the human right to development. The chapter considers United Nations instruments pertaining to disability, and the efforts underway to pass a convention on behalf of disabled persons. It concludes with a few thoughts on the potential consequences of viewing disability as universal to rather than abnormal from the human condition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203144114 · Cited by 443
Disability in a Human Rights Context
Degener, T. (2016) · Laws · doi:10.3390/laws5030035 · Cited by 367
The Potential of the Legal Capacity Law Reform in Peru to Transform Mental Health Provision
Encalada, A. V. (2021) · Mental Health, Legal Capacity, and Human Rights · doi:10.1017/9781108979016.011 · Cited by 2
Yamin, A. E. (2021) · Mental Health, Legal Capacity, and Human Rights · doi:10.1017/9781108979016.004 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Stein, M. A.
- Venue
- Nussbaum and Law
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2017-07-05
- Pages
- 3-49
- OpenAlex
- W1481903985
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 97.79
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Disability Human Rights. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315090412-1
- The paper
- Stein, M. A. (2017). Disability Human Rights. Nussbaum and Law. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315090412-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.