The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Differences in Arithmetic
Abstract
Standards in numeracy are a constant concern to educational policy-makers. However, why are differences in arithmetical performance so marked? In Individual Differences in Arithmetic, Ann Dowker seeks to provide a better understanding of why these differences in ability exist, encouraging a more informed approach to tackling numeracy difficulties. This book reviews existing research by the author and by others on the subject of arithmetical ability and presents strong evidence to support a componential view of arithmetic. Focusing primarily on children, but including discussion of arithmetical cognition in healthy adults and neuropsychological patients, each of the central components of arithmetic is covered. Within this volume, findings from developmental, educational, cognitive and neuropsychological studies are integrated in a unique approach. This book covers subjects such as: Counting and the importance of individual differences. Arithmetic facts, procedures and different forms of memory. Causes of, and interventions with, mathematical difficulties. The effects of culture, language and experience. The educational implications of these findings are discussed in detail, revealing original insights that will be of great interest to those studying or researching in the areas of education, neuroscience and developmental and cognitive psychology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bull, R., & Scerif, G. (2001) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1207/s15326942dn1903_3 · Cited by 1,501
Differential Contributions of the Left and Right Inferior Parietal Lobules to Number Processing
Chochon, F., Cohen, L., Moortele, P. F. V. D., & Dehaene, S. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563689 · Cited by 591
Castro-Caldas, A. (1998) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/121.6.1053 · Cited by 395
Cited by
Mathematics anxiety: what have we learned in 60 years?
Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00508 · Cited by 811
Self-citationAndersson, U. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709907x209854 · Cited by 174
Raising early achievement in math with interactive apps: A randomized control trial.
Outhwaite, L. A., Faulder, M., Gulliford, A., & Pitchford, N. J. (2019) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000286 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Dowker, A.
- Venue
- Psychology Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2005-11-30
- OpenAlex
- W2937665528
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 2.65
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual Differences in Arithmetic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203324899
- The paper
- Dowker, A. (2005). Individual Differences in Arithmetic. Psychology Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203324899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.