Cited by 395Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismLanguage Development and Disorders

The illiterate brain. Learning to read and write during childhood influences the functional organization of the adult brain

Open access
Castro-Caldas, A·1998·Brain

Abstract

Learning a specific skill during childhood may partly determine the functional organization of the adult brain. This hypothesis led us to study oral language processing in illiterate subjects who, for social reasons, had never entered school and had no knowledge of reading or writing. In a brain activation study using PET and statistical parametric mapping, we compared word and pseudoword repetition in literate and illiterate subjects. Our study confirms behavioural evidence of different phonological processing in illiterate subjects. During repetition of real words, the two groups performed similarly and activated similar areas of the brain. In contrast, illiterate subjects had more difficulty repeating pseudowords correctly and did not activate the same neural structures as literates. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that learning the written form of language (orthography) interacts with the function of oral language. Our results indicate that learning to read and write during childhood influences the functional organization of the adult human brain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/121.6.1053

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The acquisition of literacy modifies the brain network involved in speech repetition (especially for pseudo-words).

    “It is known that the acquisition of literacy modifies the brain network involved in speech repetition (especially for pseudo-words, see Castro-Caldas et al., 1998).”

    From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Castro-Caldas et al., 1998

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Adrian JA. Habilidade metafonoligica en sujetos analfabetos y malos lectores. Bol Psicol 1993; 39: 7-19.
  2. Mesulam M-M, Mufson EJ. The insula of Reil in man and monkey: architectonics, connectivity, and function. In: Peters A, Jones EG, editors. Cerebral cortex, Vol. 4. New York: Plenum Press; 1985. p. 179-226.
  3. Noble CE. Measurements of association value (a), rated associations (aЈ), and scaled meaningfulness (mЈ) for the 2100 CVC combinations of the English alphabet. Psychol Rep 1961; 8: 487-521.
  4. Reis A, Castro-Caldas A. Illiteracy: a bias for cognitive development. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 1997; 3: 444-50.
  5. Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructures of cognition. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 1986.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castro-Caldas, A.
Venue
Brain
Published
1998-06-01
Volume
121
Issue
6
Pages
1053-1063
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2149085656
Cited by
395
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 19
FWCI
25.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
illiteracy, reading acquisition, writing acquisition, phonological processing, non-word repetition, word repetition, orthography, brain activation, children's learning
MeSH terms
Aged, Behavior, Brain, Brain Mapping, Child, Child Development, Educational Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reading, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Verbal Learning, Writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review