Cited by 175Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsCognitive Abilities and TestingDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Working memory as a predictor of written arithmetical skills in children: The importance of central executive functions

Andersson, Ulf.·2008·British Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Background . The study was conducted in an attempt to further our understanding of how working memory contributes to written arithmetical skills in children. Aim . The aim was to pinpoint the contribution of different central executive functions and to examine the contribution of the two subcomponents of children's written arithmetical skills. Sample and method . A total of 141 third‐ and fourth‐graders were administered arithmetical tasks and measures of working memory, fluid IQ and reading. Regression analysis was used to examine the relationship between working memory and written arithmetical skills. Results . Three central executive measures (counting span, trail making and verbal fluency) and one phonological loop measure (Digit Span) were significant and predictors of arithmetical performance when the influence of reading, age and IQ was controlled for in the analysis. Conclusions . The present findings demonstrate that working memory, in general, and the central executive, in particular, contribute to children's arithmetical skills. It was hypothesized that monitoring and coordinating multiple processes, and accessing arithmetical knowledge from long‐term memory, are important central executive functions during arithmetical performance. The contribution of the phonological loop and the central executive (concurrent processing and storage of numerical information) indicates that children aged 9–10 years primarily utilize verbal coding strategies during written arithmetical performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000709907x209854

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • EF have been shown to explain at least as much variance in academic achievement as intelligence.

    “In fact, EF have been shown to explain at least as much variance in academic achievement as intelligence (e.g., Swanson, 2004; Altemeier et al., 2008; Andersson, 2008; Alloway and Alloway, 2010; Lu et al., 2011)”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Andersson, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersson, U.
Affiliations
Linköping University (SE)
Corresponding author
Andersson, Ulf.
Venue
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
181-203
ISSN
  • 0007-0998 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8279
OpenAlex
W2062472145
Cited by
174
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
working memory, central executive function, written arithmetic, arithmetic skills, children, phonological loop, Trail Making Test, verbal fluency, digit span, fluid intelligence, reading
MeSH terms
Achievement, Aptitude, Child, Humans, Intelligence, Mathematics, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Phonetics, Problem Solving, Reading, Sweden, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review