The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cyberprotest
Open accessAbstract
Ever since the anti-globalisation protests in Seattle in 1999 the adoption of new information and communications technologies (ICTs) by social movement activists has offered the prospect for the development of global cyberprotest. The Internet with its transnational many-to-many communication facility offers a revolutionary potential for social movements to go online and circumvent the 'official' messages of political and commercial organisations and the traditional media, by speaking directly to the citizens of the world. Furthermore the use of electronic mail (e-mail), mailing lists, websites, electronic forums and other online applications provide powerful media tools for co-ordinating the activity of often physically dispersed movement actors. Moreover, ICTs may also contribute to the important function of social movements of shaping collective identity and countering the claims and arguments of established political interests. A growing body of literature during the last decades of the twentieth century attests to the significant impact SMs have had upon the restructuring of the political landscape. Most of that literature addresses the more traditional actors and institutions (e.g. parliaments, political parties, bureaucracy etc.). Less attention has been devoted to those manifestations of political action that are concentrated around social movements and all kinds of more or less institutionalised and sustainable forms of citizen mobilisation. This book is a collection of cases that take a critical look into the way ICTs are finding their way into the world of social movements
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansisons of Resource Mobilization Theory
Klandermans, B. (1984) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095417 · Cited by 1,270
Radical Media: Rebellious Communication and Social Movements
Downing, J. (2001) · doi:10.4135/9781452204994 · Cited by 1,184
Cited by
Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W., & García-Albacete, G. (2015) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2014.948035 · Cited by 504
Rethinking the fragmentation of the cyberpublic: from consensus to contestation
Dahlberg, L. (2007) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444807081228 · Cited by 366
Launching Revolution: Social Media and the Egyptian Uprising’s First Movers
Clarke, K., & Kocak, K. (2020) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123418000194 · Cited by 72
Grievance Articulation and Community Reactions in the Men’s Rights Movement Online
Rafail, P., & Freitas, I. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305119841387 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2004-08-02
- OpenAlex
- W1500423741
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.75
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cyberprotest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203644225
- The paper
- Cyberprotest. (2004). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203644225
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.