The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biochar for Environmental Management: Science, Technology and Implementation
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, cost-benefit calculations clearly showed that at current prices for industrially produced biochar (i.e., 600-900 Euros•t -1 ) [7], the application of such large amounts of biochar is economically not viable for farmers [8].”
From Fourfold increase in pumpkin yield in response to low-dosage root zone application of urine-enhanced biochar to a fertile tropical soil (2015) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The authors of the study further concluded that positive changes in crop productivity might only be achieved when biochar application rates exceed 5 t•ha -1 [6].”
From Fourfold increase in pumpkin yield in response to low-dosage root zone application of urine-enhanced biochar to a fertile tropical soil (2015) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“In many cases, net lifecycle emissions will largely depend on whether the biomass used as a soil amendment would have otherwise been burnt (either for fuel, thereby offsetting fossil fuel use, or as waste disposal), added to a landfill, or left in place as living biomass or detritus 42,43”
From Climate-smart soils (2016) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Paustian, K., Lehmann, J., Ogle, S., Reay, D., Robertson, G. P., & Smith, P. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17174 · Cited by 2,213
Self-citationAn overview on engineering the surface area and porosity of biochar
Leng, L., Xiong, Q., Yang, L., Li, H., Zhou, Y., Zhang, W., Jiang, S., Li, H., & Huang, H. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144204 · Cited by 1,414
Soil structure and microbiome functions in agroecosystems
Hartmann, M., & Six, J. (2022) · Nature Reviews Earth & Environment · doi:10.1038/s43017-022-00366-w · Cited by 1,406
Joseph, S., Cowie, A. L., Van Zwieten, L., Bolan, N., Budai, A., Buss, W., Cayuela, M. L., Graber, E. R., Ippolito, J. A., Kuzyakov, Y., et al. (2021) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12885 · Cited by 1,090
“Reviews and meta- analyses show that biochar generally lowers soil acidity and increases buffering capacity; increases dissolved and total organic C, CEC, available nutrients, water retention, and aggregate stability; and reduces bulk density (El- Naggar et al., 2019; Lehmann & Joseph, 2015).”
BackgroundSelf-citationGlobal change pressures on soils from land use and management
Smith, P., House, J. I., Bustamante, M., Sobocká, J., Harper, R. J., Pan, G., West, P. C., Clark, J. M., Adhya, T. K., Rumpel, C., et al. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13068 · Cited by 1,087
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehmann, J.
- Corresponding author
- Lehmann, Johannes
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2015-02-20
- OpenAlex
- W2409219597
- Cited by
- 2,280
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 305 · 2025: 270 · 2024: 214 · 2023: 214 · 2022: 189 · 2021: 266 · 2020: 235 · 2019: 192 · 2018: 144 · 2017: 140 · 2016: 75 · 2015: 30
- FWCI
- 123.41
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
- Keywords
- biochar, environmental management, carbon sequestration, soil amendment, pollutant removal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
