CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 130

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Archaeology of Mothering

Wilkie, Laurie A.·2003
DOI 10.4324/9780203821176
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using archaeological materials recovered from a housesite in Mobile, Alabama, Laurie Wilkie explores how one extended African-American family engaged with competing and conflicting mothering ideologies in the post-Emancipation South.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9780203821176

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women's social reproduction ranged from maintaining family continuity and facilitating the intergenerational transmission of culture during enslavement, to managing reproductive health, to midwifing babies, and to caring for mothers pre-and postpartum.

    “Women's social reproduction ranged from maintaining family continuity and facilitating the intergenerational transmission of culture during enslavement (Battle-Baptiste 2011), to managing reproductive health (Barnes 2021), to midwifing babies into the world, and to caring for mothers pre-and postpartum (Wilkie 2003).”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Wilkie 2003

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wilkie, L. A.
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2003-09-03
DOI
10.4324/9780203821176
Cited by
130
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review