The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sacred Ecology
Abstract
Sacred Ecology examines bodies of knowledge held by indigenous and other rural peoples around the world, and asks how we can learn from this knowledge and ways of knowing. Berkes explores the importance of local and indigenous knowledge as a complement to scientific ecology, and its cultural and political significance for indigenous groups themselves. This second edition is expanded and updated throughout, and places greater emphasis on "knowledge as process". It has two new chapters, Chapter 8 on climate change, demonstrating how indigenous communities "read" environmental signals, and Chapter 9 on how indigenous knowledge deals with complexity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P., & Spierenburg, M. (2014) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3 · Cited by 1,329
Indigenous ways of knowing and the study of environmental change
Berkes, F. (2009) · Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · doi:10.1080/03014220909510568 · Cited by 501
Self-citationGrey, S., & Patel, R. (2015) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-014-9548-9 · Cited by 302
Ten Years of REDD+: A Critical Review of the Impact of REDD+ on Forest-Dependent Communities
Bayrak, M., & Marafa, L. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8070620 · Cited by 179
Restoration and Reciprocity: The Contributions of Traditional Ecological Knowledge
Kimmerer, R. (2011) · Human Dimensions of Ecological Restoration · doi:10.5822/978-1-61091-039-2_18 · Cited by 161
Toward thick legitimacy: Creating a web of legitimacy for agroecology
Montenegro de Wit, M., & Iles, A. (2016) · Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene · doi:10.12952/journal.elementa.000115 · Cited by 91
Hybridizing sustainability: towards a new praxis for the present human predicament
Benessia, A., Funtowicz, S., Bradshaw, G., Ferri, F., Ráez-Luna, E. F., & Medina, C. P. (2012) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0150-4 · Cited by 91
Indigenous governance of cultural heritage: searching for alternatives to co-management
Grey, S., & Kuokkanen, R. (2020) · International Journal of Heritage Studies · doi:10.1080/13527258.2019.1703202 · Cited by 72
Using Indigenous and Western knowledge systems for environmental risk assessment
Buell, M.-C., Ritchie, D., Ryan, K., & Metcalfe, C. D. (2020) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.2146 · Cited by 28
Feeling solastalgia: A study of the effects of changing climate in rural India
Kumar, P., Kumar, N., & Sarthi, P. P. (2021) · Asian Journal Of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/ajsp.12473 · Cited by 29
DIVERSIDAD BIOCULTURAL: INNOVANDO EN INVESTIGACIÓN PARA LA CONSERVACIÓN
Nemogá, G. R. (2016) · Acta Biológica Colombiana · doi:10.15446/abc.v21n1supl.50920 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Berkes, F., & Berkes, F.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2008-02-29
- OpenAlex
- W4241954441
- Cited by
- 554
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.62
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
