The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Synthesis of Research on Second Language Writing in English
Abstract
'I applaud the authors for this sizeable undertaking, as well as the care exercised in selecting and sequencing topics and subtopics. A major strength and salient feature of this volume is its range: It will serve as a key reference tool for researchers working in L2 composition and in allied fields.' – John Hedgcock, Monterey Institute for International Studies Synthesizing twenty-five years of the most significant and influential findings of published research on second language writing in English, this volume promotes understanding and provides access to research developments in the field. Overall, it distinguishes the major contexts of English L2 learning in North America, synthesizes the research themes, issues, and findings that span these contexts, and interprets the methodological progression and substantive findings of this body of knowledge. Of particular interest is the extensive bibliography, which makes this volume an essential reference tool for libraries and serious writing professionals, both researchers and practitioners, both L1 and L2. This book is designed to allow researchers to become familiar with the most important research on this topic, to promote understanding of pedagogical needs of L2 writing students, and to introduce graduate students to L2 writing research findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763
The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405
Cited by
Bunch, G. C. (2013) · Review of Research in Education · doi:10.3102/0091732x12461772 · Cited by 446
The Routledge Handbook of Language Testing
(2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203181287 · Cited by 345
A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007 · Cited by 220
Vyatkina, N., Hirschmann, H., & Golcher, F. (2015) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2015.06.006 · Cited by 70
Multi-draft composing: An iterative model for academic argument writing
Eckstein, G., Chariton, J., & McCollum, R. M. (2011) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.05.004 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2010-04-15
- OpenAlex
- W616638701
- Cited by
- 421
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 49.33
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Synthesis of Research on Second Language Writing in English. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9780203930250
- The paper
- Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2010). A Synthesis of Research on Second Language Writing in English. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203930250
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.