Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 916

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing

Taylor, Shelley E., Crocker, Jennifer·2022·Social Cognition

Abstract

The term, schema, appears to have been first used by Bartlett in 1932 in his work on recall of perceptual experience. A minimal theory is not, however, necessarily a good theory, and so one may want to inquire of the schema’s literature not only if the minimum criterion of a theory has been met, but if it is a good theory. When a stimulus configuration is encountered in the environment, it is matched against a schema, and the ordering and relations among the elements of the schema are imposed on the elements of the stimulus configuration. Studies comparing the effects of memory set versus impression set on recall also point to the structuring function of schemas. Information is easier to recall, however, if it is structured in some way, and there is evidence that people will structure stimuli so as to facilitate recall. Default options may not only be inserted when a particular piece of data is missing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781003311386-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 916

Metadata

Authors
Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J.
Venue
Social Cognition
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2022-08-02
Pages
89-134
ISSN
0278-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3041438409
Cited by
916
References
0
FWCI
82.35
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781003311386-4
The paper
Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (2022). Schematic Bases of Social Information Processing. Social Cognition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003311386-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.