Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,754

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Challenge of Problem-based Learning

Boud, David, Feletti, Grahame·2013·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Not just a method framework for PBL why is PBL a challenge good planning persevering with PBL conversion to PBL PBL at Harvard organizational impediments selection of health problems innovation in nursing issues in conventional programme preparing tertiary teachers hybrid model at Harvard case writing at Harvard becoming a PBL tutor PBL in mechanical engineering PBL in social work PBL in optometry PBL in architecture PBL in inquiry and action learning PBL in law practice industrial enhancement PBL in management assessment in architecture what should be assessed strategies for assessment learning for assessment evaluating the impact of PBL PBL - only way? praxis of situation improving limits of PBL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315042039

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Boud, D., & Feletti, G.
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2013-11-26
OpenAlex
W1585728732
Cited by
1,754
References
0
FWCI
73.53
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.