The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conducting Educational Design Research
Open accessAbstract
Educational design research blends scientific investigation with the systematic development and implementation of solutions to educational challenges. Empirical inquiry is conducted in real learning settings – not laboratories – to craft effective solutions to the complex challenges facing educational practitioners. At the same time, the research is carefully structured to produce theoretical understanding that can serve the work of others. Conducting Educational Design Research, 2nd Edition has been written to support graduate students as well as experienced researchers who are new to this approach. Part I describes the origins, outcomes, and generic approach. Part II discusses the core processes of the generic approach in detail. Part III recommends how to propose, report, and advance educational design research. In addition to expanded treatment of research goals and practicalities, more examples, and attention to design-based implementation research, this new edition features enhanced guidance. For each of the four core processes, this volume offers: assessment tools detailed, behind-the-scenes descriptions of actual project work examples of how specific theories have been used to enrich the work For decades, policies for educational research worldwide have swung back and forth between demanding rigor above all other concerns, and increasing emphasis on impact. These two qualities, rigor and impact, need not be mutually exclusive. This volume supports readers in grasping and realizing the potential of educational design research. It demonstrates how rigorous and relevant investigation can yield both theoretical understanding and solutions to urgent educational challenges.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x · Cited by 12,604
The New Meaning of Educational Change
Fullan, M. (2001) · doi:10.4324/9780203986561 · Cited by 4,373
Design Experiments in Educational Research
Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032001009 · Cited by 3,548
An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x09339057 · Cited by 2,721
Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1374249 · Cited by 2,682
Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground
Barab, S., & Squire, K. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1301_1 · Cited by 2,642
Social Capital and Community Resilience
Aldrich, D. P., & Meyer, M. A. (2015) · American Behavioral Scientist · doi:10.1177/0002764214550299 · Cited by 2,331
Boundary spanning roles and organization structure
Aldrich, H., & Herker, D. (1977) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257905 · Cited by 1,518
Rethinking Scale: Moving Beyond Numbers to Deep and Lasting Change
Coburn, C. E. (2003) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x032006003 · Cited by 1,030
Klopfer, E., & Squire, K. (2008) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9037-6 · Cited by 989
Cited by
AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions
Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025 · Cited by 923
Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment
Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2014) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.819566 · Cited by 390
Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: a synthesis
Maaß, K., & Artigue, M. (2013) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-013-0528-0 · Cited by 216
McKenney, S., Kali, Y., Markauskaite, L., & Voogt, J. (2015) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9337-2 · Cited by 161
Self-citationKaya, O. S., & Ercag, E. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11585-z · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-09-03
- OpenAlex
- W2129660020
- Cited by
- 1,354
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 178.97
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conducting Educational Design Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315105642
- The paper
- McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting Educational Design Research. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.