The DOI matches its Crossref record; 284 of the 284 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services
Open accessAbstract
Co-production and co-creation occur when citizens participate actively in delivering and designing the services they receive. It has come increasingly onto the agenda of policymakers, as interest in citizen participation has more generally soared. Expectations are high and it is regarded as a possible solution to the public sector’s decreased legitimacy and dwindling resources, by accessing more of society’s capacities. In addition, it is seen as part of a more general drive to reinvigorate voluntary participation and strengthen social cohesion in an increasingly fragmented and individualized society. Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services offers a systematic and comprehensive theoretical and empirical examination of the concepts of co-production and co-creation and their application in practice. It shows the latest state of knowledge on the topic and will be of interest to students at an advanced level, academics and reflective practitioners. It addresses the topics with regard to co-production and co-creation and will be of interest to researchers, academics, policymakers, and students in the fields of public administration, business administration, economics, political science, public management, political science, service management, sociology and voluntary sector studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-0977 · Cited by 11,572
Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy
van Manen, M. (1990) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,308
Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy
Stern, F., & Putnam, R. (1993) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20045657 · Cited by 11,137
Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1998.926617 · Cited by 10,274
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism
Hicks, A., & Esping-Andersen, G. (1991) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073705 · Cited by 7,092
From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision
Bass, B. M. (1990) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-s · Cited by 4,686
Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems
Ostrom, E. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · Cited by 4,529
Cited by
Sannino, A. (2020) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/0158037x.2020.1725459 · Cited by 68
A Scoping Review of Empirical Evidence on (Digital) Public Services Co-Creation
Rodriguez Müller, A. P., Casiano Flores, C., Albrecht, V., Steen, T., & Crompvoets, J. (2021) · Administrative Sciences · doi:10.3390/admsci11040130 · Cited by 65
Self-citationCo-design as a metagovernance strategy for complex problems in local governments
Kim, A., & Mulder, I. (2026) · CoDesign · doi:10.1080/15710882.2026.2635482
Metadata
- Authors
- Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2018-03-15
- OpenAlex
- W2785413673
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 284
- FWCI
- 28.77
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315204956
- The paper
- Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (2018). Co-Production and Co-Creation: Engaging Citizens in Public Services. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315204956
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.