The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Conceptual Approaches to Stereotypes and Stereotyping
Abstract
This volume presents an analysis of stereotyping and intergroup behavior from a \ncognitive perspective. While no single unified theory is articulated, the authors \nof the chapters that follow do share a cognitive orientation. The purpose of the \npresent chapter is to place this orientation within the context of other social \nscientific approaches to the study of stereotypes. Three separate, yet highly \ninterrelated, aspects of stereotype research and theory will be examined. First, a \nhistory of the stereotype concept is presented. Here we discuss the significant \nevents and trends of the past that condition present and likely future efforts in this \narea. Second, the various meanings ascribed to the term stereotype are considered. Implicit as well as explicit and operational as well as conceptual definitions \nare reviewed in order to explicate both areas of agreement and disagreement \nregarding how the construct "stereotype" is best defined. Finally, we discuss the \nbasic orientations taken by social scientists in seeking to understand stereotypes. \nAlthough not sufficiently explicit or complete to be called "theories," three \nperspectives are clearly discernible-sociocultural, psychodynamic, and cognitive. The elements and implications of each of these three orientations are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373 · Cited by 3,435
Payne, D. L., Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1006/jrpe.1998.2238 · Cited by 1,114
A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of prejudice.
Crandall, C. S., & Eshleman, A. (2003) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.414 · Cited by 1,085
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779543000002 · Cited by 611
Group Conflict, Prejudice, and the Paradox of Contemporary Racial Attitudes
Bobo, L. (1988) · Eliminating Racism · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0818-6_5 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Venue
- Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior
- Publisher
- Psychology Press
- Published
- 2015-08-11
- Pages
- 15-50
- OpenAlex
- W3005115750
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 162.62
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptual Approaches to Stereotypes and Stereotyping. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781315668758-7
- The paper
- Conceptual Approaches to Stereotypes and Stereotyping. (2015). Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behavior. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315668758-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.