Cited by 272Media Studies and CommunicationMedia Influence and HealthMedia Influence and Politics

Choice and Preference in Media Use

Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia·2014·Routledge eBooks

Abstract

Mediated messages flood our daily lives, through virtually endless choices of media channels, genres, and content. However, selectivity determines what media messages we attend to and focus on. The present book examines the factors that influence this selectivity. Seminal books on selective media exposure were published in 1960 by Klapper and in 1985 by Zillmann and Bryant. But an integrated update on this research field is much needed, as rigorous selective exposure research has flourished in the new millennium. In the contexts of political communication, health communication, Internet use, entertainment consumption, and electronic games, the crucial question of how individuals choose what content they consume has garnered much attention. The present book integrates theories and empirical evidence from these domains and discusses the related research methodologies. In light of the ever-increasing abundance of media channels and messages, selective exposure has become more important than ever for media impacts. This monograph provides a comprehensive review of the research on selective exposure to media messages, which is at the heart of communication science and media effects. It is required reading for media scholars and researchers, and promises to influence and inspire future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4324/9781315771359

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • La identidad política del individuo le lleva a exponerse selectivamente a ciertos contenidos y el consumo de esos contenidos termina por exacerbar su identidad, incrementando la polarización entre los grupos.

    “La evidencia acumulada sostiene que la identidad política del individuo le lleva a exponerse selectivamente a ciertos contenidos y que es el consumo de esos contenidos el que termina por exacerbar su identidad, incrementando, por tanto, la polarización entre los grupos (Gvirsman, 2014;Knobloch-Westerwick, 2014;Lu & Lee, 2019).”

    From Política, uso de medios y polarización afectiva en España (2024) · cites this paper as Knobloch-Westerwick, 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Knobloch-Westerwick, S.
Venue
Routledge eBooks
Publisher
Routledge
Published
2014-07-25
OpenAlex
W2897838581
Cited by
272
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.19
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Routledge eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Thammasat University Digital Collections (submittedVersion)
  • TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
selective exposure, media selection, media preferences, media selectivity, political communication, health communication, internet use, entertainment consumption, video games, media influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review