Cited by 86Media Influence and PoliticsElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationMedia Studies and Communication

Partisan Information Sources and Affective Polarization: Panel Analysis of the Mediating Role of Anger and Fear

Lu, Yanqin, Lee, Jae Kook·2019·Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly

Abstract

Drawing on the 2012 American National Election Studies (ANES) panel data, this study explores the influence of the consumption of partisan information sources on affective polarization and investigates the mechanism underlying this relationship. The results show that exposure to pro-party television sources strengthens affective polarization among partisans. The polarizing effects of pro-party sources are mediated by the discrete negative emotions (i.e., anger and fear) toward presidential candidates. The study discusses the impact of selective exposure on deliberative and participatory democracies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1077699018811295

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surveys find associations between holding polarized attitudes and reported consumption of like-minded news.

    “although surveys find associations between holding polarized attitudes and reported consumption of like-minded news26,27”
  • La identidad política del individuo le lleva a exponerse selectivamente a ciertos contenidos y el consumo de esos contenidos termina por exacerbar su identidad, incrementando la polarización entre los grupos.

    “La evidencia acumulada sostiene que la identidad política del individuo le lleva a exponerse selectivamente a ciertos contenidos y que es el consumo de esos contenidos el que termina por exacerbar su identidad, incrementando, por tanto, la polarización entre los grupos (Gvirsman, 2014;Knobloch-Westerwick, 2014;Lu & Lee, 2019).”

    From Política, uso de medios y polarización afectiva en España (2024) · cites this paper as Lu & Lee, 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Bowling Green State University (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Lu, Yanqin
Venue
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly
Published
2018-11-26
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
767-783
ISSN
  • 1077-6990 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-430X
OpenAlex
W2902033609
Cited by
86
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
20.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
Keywords
affective polarization, anger, fear, selective exposure, presidential candidates, negative emotions, deliberative democracy, participatory democracy, 2012 presidential election

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review