The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Advances in Instructional Psychology
Abstract
The contributors to this volume address reasoning and problem solving as fundamental to learning and teaching and to modern literacy. The research on expertise and the development of competence makes it clear that structures of knowledge and cognitive process should be tightly linked throughout education to attain high levels of ability. The longstanding pedagogical assumption that the attainment of useful knowledge proceeds from lower level learning based on the practice of fundamental skills that demand little thought, to higher level competence in which problem solving finally plays an increasing role, is no longer tenable. It is now clear that thinking is not an outcome of basic learning, but is part of the basic acquisition of knowledge and skill. In learning to read, for example, decoding the printed word and understanding simple texts is an act of problem solving, requiring inference and elaboration by the reader. The prevalence of reasoning with information at all levels makes the details of its involvement a fundamental influence on learning and instruction -- a recurring theme in each of the chapters. A rich variety of topics is addressed including: *an analysis of the components of teaching competence *the evolution of a learner's mathematical understanding *the use of causal models for generating scientific explanations *the facilitation of meaningful learning through text illustrations *the competence of children in argumentative interaction that results in conceptual change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Items 101–111 of 111
Lohman, D. F., & Lakin, J. M. (2011) · The Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511977244.022 · Cited by 42
Explanation recruits comparison in a category-learning task
Edwards, B. J., Williams, J. J., Gentner, D., & Lombrozo, T. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.011 · Cited by 34
Psycharis, S. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.015 · Cited by 34
Meta-attention: do we know when we are being distracted?
Reisberg, D., & McLean, J. (1985) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221309.1985.9711015 · Cited by 21
Assessment of metacognitive knowledge in students with special educational needs
Händel, M., Lockl, K., Heydrich, J., Weinert, S., & Artelt, C. (2014) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-014-9119-x · Cited by 20
Contrastive Constraints Guide Explanation‐Based Category Learning
Chin‐Parker, S., & Cantelon, J. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12405 · Cited by 18
Metacognitive Monitoring and Academic Performance in College
Wagener, B. (2016) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567555.2015.1116056 · Cited by 19
Uncovering Gender and Problem Difficulty Effects in Learning with an Educational Game
McLaren, B., Farzan, R., Adams, D., Mayer, R., & Forlizzi, J. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-61425-0_59 · Cited by 17
A contrastive account of explanation generation
Chin-Parker, S., & Bradner, A. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1349-x · Cited by 15
Digital assessment environments for scientific inquiry practices
Gobert, J. D., & Sao Pedro, M. A. (2016) · The Handbook of Cognition and Assessment · doi:10.1002/9781118956588.ch21 · Cited by 14
Coherent Experiences: The New Missing Paradigm in Teacher Education
Weston, T. L., & Henderson, S. C. (2015) · The Educational Forum · doi:10.1080/00131725.2015.1037514 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2019-10-25
- OpenAlex
- W600881208
- Cited by
- 2,532
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.73
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.