The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mathematics Classrooms That Promote Understanding
Abstract
Contents: Preface. Part I: Setting the Stage. T.A. Romberg, J.J. Kaput, Mathematics Worth Teaching, Mathematics Worth Understanding. T.P. Carpenter, R. Lehrer, Teaching and Learning Mathematics With Understanding. W.G. Secada, P.W. Berman, Equity as a Value-Added Dimension in Teaching for Understanding in School Mathematics. Part II: Classrooms That Promote Understanding. T.P. Carpenter, E. Fennema, K. Fuson, J. Hiebert, P. Human, H. Murray, A. Olivier, D. Wearne, Learning Basic Number Concepts and Skills as Problem Solving. R. Lehrer, C. Jacobson, V. Kemeny, D. Strom, Building on Children's Intuitions to Develop Mathematical Understanding of Space. J. Sowder, R. Philipp, Promoting Learning in Middle-Grades Mathematics. S.P. Lajoie, Understanding of Statistics. J.J. Kaput, Teaching and Learning a New Algebra. Part III: Developing Classrooms That Promote Understanding. M.C. Shafer, T.A. Romberg, Assessment in Classrooms That Promote Understanding. E. Fennema, J. Sowder, T.P. Carpenter, Creating Classrooms That Promote Understanding.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Functional Thinking as a Route Into Algebra in the Elementary Grades
Blanton, M. L., & Kaput, J. J. (2011) · Advances in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_2 · Cited by 177
Western University, Sedig, K., Parsons, P., & Western University (2013) · AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.17705/1thci.00055 · Cited by 145
Algebra in elementary school: Developing relational thinking
Carpenter, T. P., Levi, L., Franke, M. L., & Zeringue, J. K. (2005) · Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik · doi:10.1007/bf02655897 · Cited by 140
A Taxonomy for Categorizing Generalizations: Generalizing Actions and Reflection Generalizations
Ellis, A. B. (2007) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1080/10508400701193705 · Cited by 141
Amit, M., & Neria, D. (2008) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-007-0069-5 · Cited by 93
The Algebraic Nature of Fractions: Developing Relational Thinking in Elementary School
Empson, S. B., Levi, L., & Carpenter, T. P. (2011) · Advances in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-17735-4_22 · Cited by 85
Stephens, A. C. (2006) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-006-9000-1 · Cited by 81
Recursive and explicit rules: How can we build student algebraic understanding?
Lannin, J. K., Barker, D. D., & Townsend, B. E. (2006) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2006.11.004 · Cited by 76
El Mouhayar, R. R., & Jurdak, M. E. (2013) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/s10649-012-9434-6 · Cited by 40
Yeşildere İmre, S., & Akkoç, H. (2012) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-012-9203-6 · Cited by 33
Prospective elementary teachers use of representation to reason algebraically
Richardson, K., Berenson, S., & Staley, K. (2009) · The Journal of Mathematical Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.09.002 · Cited by 32
Learning mathematics for teaching in the student teaching experience: two contrasting cases
Peterson, B. E., & Williams, S. R. (2008) · Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education · doi:10.1007/s10857-008-9085-9 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- OpenAlex
- W1532525943
- Cited by
- 400
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.62
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
