The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes
Abstract
This volume presents a range of views about language, learning, and teaching in English for Specific Purposes (ESP). Its purpose is to go beyond individual cases and practices to examine the approaches and ideas on which they are based. The aim is for readers to adopt an analytical stance toward the field and to identify current perspectives in ESP and the ideas driving them.Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes does not promote any one approach, but rather identifies and illustrates those in evidence today. The main emphasis is on the links between theory and ESP teaching and research. Ideas from linguistics, sociolinguistics, education, SLA, and social theories are described. Links are then made between these ideas and ESP course designs, instructional materials, and research projects. Thus the book moves back and forth between descriptions of theories, teaching practice, and research.Part I introduces the book's approach to description of ESP and the framework used to investigate it. Part II examines ideas of language, learning, and teaching in ESP. Recognizing that ESP is taught in many different countries and contexts, the author draws on a wide range of examples of teaching practice and research from around the world and from different branches of ESP, including English for Academic Purposes, English for Professional Purposes, and English for Vocational Purposes. From Chapter 3 onward, each chapter includes Questions for Discussion and Projects, to encourage readers to research and analyze the practices of ESP in their own contexts and to consider the ideas they draw on in their own teaching.This text is geared toward graduate-level TESOL education courses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Anderson, J. R. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781315799438 · Cited by 6,761
Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings
James, M. O., & Swales, J. M. (1992) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/329786 · Cited by 4,694
Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications
Anderson, J. R. (2014) · Cited by 4,121
The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition
Long, M. H. (1996) · Handbook of Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1016/b978-012589042-7/50015-3 · Cited by 3,927
(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,037
Explorations in the functions of language
Halliday, M. A. K. (1973) · Cited by 2,267
CULTURAL THOUGHT PATTERNS IN INTER‐CULTURAL EDUCATION
Kaplan, R. B. (1966) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x · Cited by 2,069
Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure
THOMAS, J. (1983) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/4.2.91 · Cited by 1,894
Cited by
Teo, T., Khazaie, S., & Derakhshan, A. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104406 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Basturkmen, H.
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2014-03-14
- OpenAlex
- W1543025817
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 11.37
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781410617040
- The paper
- Basturkmen, H. (2014). Ideas and Options in English for Specific Purposes. Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410617040
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.