The DOI matches its Crossref record.
“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”
Abstract
This chapter describes the essential features of psychology’s ethical code (APA, 1992). Historically, it was the first ethical code established by a mental health profession and has served as the model for the ethical codes developed by counseling, psychiatry, and social work. This chapter will provide an opportunity for readers to assess how their values relate to the ethical code of the profession of psychology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022) · Qualitative Psychology · doi:10.1037/qup0000196 · Cited by 4,502
Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues.
Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., Eisman, E. J., Kubiszyn, T. W., & Reed, G. M. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.2.128 · Cited by 1,469
Gentile, D. A., Lynch, P. J., Linder, J. R., & Walsh, D. A. (2004) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2003.10.002 · Cited by 962
Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00029.x · Cited by 959
Distinguishing addiction and high engagement in the context of online game playing
Charlton, J. P., & Danforth, I. D. W. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2005.07.002 · Cited by 946
Metadata
- Venue
- Ethical Reasoning in the Mental Health Professions
- Publisher
- CRC Press
- Published
- 2000-09-19
- Pages
- 23-40
- OpenAlex
- W3080738154
- Cited by
- 4,251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 449.77
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781482274400-4
- The paper
- “Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”. (2000). Ethical Reasoning in the Mental Health Professions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781482274400-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
