The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-level governance
Abstract
This chapter considers the origins, development and key debates in multi-level governance (MLG). It argues that despite evolving as a core concept within and beyond academe MLG remains an under-developed concept. To some degree this reflects the increasingly fluid governance processes it seeks to acknowledge and interrogate, but also points to the need for greater precision and rigour in the different types of MLG that combine in complex webs of modern governance. In particular we raise questions about the suitability for the analysis of contemporary governance of a binary formulation that has arisen to conceptualize different types of MLG. We see much overlapping, interconnection and blurring of the lines dividing the two types. A finer grain is required within each of the two types and between and beyond them in order to conceptualize variety and interconnectedness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001 · Cited by 2,254
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789
“In combination with insights from polynuclear governance ( Ostrom, 2010 ) and multilevel governance (Bache et al., 2016 ), this line of research promises both scientific advancements in our understanding of ecosystems and frameworks that can be operationalized for policy and entrepreneurial…”
Understanding the innovation impacts of public procurement
Uyarra, E., & Flanagan, K. (2010) · European Planning Studies · doi:10.1080/09654310903343567 · Cited by 427
Governing the Provision of Ecosystem Services
(2013) · Studies in Ecological Economics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7 · Cited by 97
Wellbeing as a wicked problem: navigating the arguments for the role of government
Bache, I., Reardon, L., & Anand, P. (2016) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9623-y · Cited by 69
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M.
- Venue
- Handbook on Theories of Governance
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2016-06-24
- OpenAlex
- W1564824153
- Cited by
- 900
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 387.02
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-level governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4337/9781782548508.00052
- The paper
- Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M. (2016). Multi-level governance. Handbook on Theories of Governance. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548508.00052
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.