Fundamental rights in EU tax law
Abstract
In this chapter, Katerina Perrou explores taxpayer rights arising from the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. Although the Charter primarily addresses the bodies and institutions of the EU itself, which does not impose taxes or related burdens on taxpayers, the Charter crucially also applies to Member States when they ‘implement Union law’. As the Court of Justice has interpreted this phrase in an ever expanding manner, and as more and more secondary law affects domestic taxation, the latter comes increasingly within the scope of the Charter rights, such as the right to privacy, the right to data protection, the right to an effective legal remedy and the right to a fair trial, to name only a few that the Court has already ruled on. The chapter devotes a significant part of its analysis to the Charter’s scope and its potential impact, before discussing the most relevant case law from recent years, including the cases WebMindLicences, Pu_kár, Sabou, Berlioz, and åkerberg Fransson. It concludes with an outlook on future research such as the continuously developing relationship between the Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ECtHR has found violations of the prohibition of discrimination in unusual tax cases, including discriminatory tax treatment of a non-resident compared to residents regarding church tax opt-out, differentiation between persons unfit for military service who were exonerated from a tax and those obliged to pay it, and failure to consider the needs of a child with disabilities when determining a
“The ECtHR has found violations of the prohibition of discrimination in quite unusual tax cases, such as those regarding (i) the discriminatory tax treatment of a non-resident in comparison to residents due to the possibility for only the latter to opt out of the payment of church tax (a violation of article 14 in conjunction with article 1 Protocol 1 of the ECHR); 164”
From Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard (2022) · cites this paper as [164]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hadwick, D., & Lan, S. (2021) · World Tax Journal · doi:10.59403/27410pa · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Tax Law: The Need for a Minimum Legal Standard
Kuźniacki, B., Almada, M., Tyliński, K., Górski, L., Winogradska, B., & Zeldenrust, R. (2022) · World Tax Journal · doi:10.59403/2yhh9pa · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Chancen und Grenzen von Schiedsverfahren im internationalen Steuerrecht
Haslehner, W. C. (2022) · MPI studies in tax law and public finance · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-65334-0_5
Chapter 13: Coordination of Tax Arbitration Instruments and Their Interaction with EU Law
Haslehner, W. C. (2023) · EC and international tax law series. · doi:10.59403/2a43jtb013
Califano, C., & Castagnari, F. (2025) · International Tax Studies · doi:10.59403/2enq6bb
Towards eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in tax law : the need for a minimum legal standard
ALMADA, M., ALMADA, M., TYLIŃSKI, K., GÓRSKI, Ł., WINOGRADSKA, B., & ZELDENRUST, R. (2022) · Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute)
- Authors
- Perrou, K.
- Corresponding author
- Perrou, Katerina
- Venue
- Research Handbook on European Union Taxation Law
- Publisher
- Edward Elgar Publishing
- Published
- 2020-01-17
- OpenAlex
- W3004534869
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 17.55
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Taxation and Legal Issues
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European and International Law Studies
- Social Sciences › Law › EU Law and Policy Analysis
- Keywords
- EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, taxpayer rights, EU tax law, Court of Justice of the European Union, right to privacy, data protection, right to a fair trial, Hector Berlioz, European Court of Human Rights
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review