Cited by 40Language and cultural evolutionPleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyPrimate Behavior and Ecology

A tentative framework for the acquisition of language and modern human cognition.

Tattersall·2016·PubMed

Abstract

Modern human beings process information symbolically, rearranging mental symbols to envision multiple potential realities. They also express the ideas they form using structured articulate language. No other living creature does either of these things. Yet it is evident that we are descended from a non-symbolic and non-linguistic ancestor. How did this astonishing transformation occur? Scrutiny of the fossil and archaeological records reveals that the transition to symbolic reasoning happened very late in hominid history - indeed, within the tenure of anatomically recognizable Homo sapiens. It was evidently not simply a passive result of the increase in brain size that typified multiple lineages of the genus Homo over the Pleistocene. Instead, a brain exaptively capable of complex symbolic manipulation and language acquisition was acquired in the major developmental reorganization that gave rise to the anatomically distinctive species Homo sapiens. The new capacity it conferred was later recruited through the action of a cultural stimulus, most plausibly the spontaneous invention of language.

Integrity signals

Registry

OpenAlex · 10.4436/jass.94030

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Linguistic ability was significantly more sophisticated in H. sapiens than in H. neanderthalensis or other Homo species.

    “The prediction made by this hypothesis is that linguistic ability was significantly more sophisticated in H. sapiens than in H. neanderthalensis or other Homo species. That idea is plausible (Tattersall, 2016), though hotly debated (Dediu and Levinson, 2013).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tattersall
Venue
PubMed
Publisher
National Institutes of Health
Published
2016-06-20
Volume
94
Pages
157-66
OpenAlex
W2474251522
Cited by
40
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
language acquisition, symbolic reasoning, human cognition, human, hominid evolution, exaptation, brain size, cultural evolution, origin of language, cognitive development
MeSH terms
Animals, Anthropology, Physical, Cognition, Biological Evolution, Fossils, Humans, Language, Phylogeny, Speech, Hominidae, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review