Cited by 48Social Media in Health EducationMedical Education and AdmissionsEmployer Branding and e-HRM

The Impact of Social Media on Anesthesia Resident Recruitment

Open access
Johnathan Ross Renew, Beth L. Ladlie, Andrew W. Gorlin, Timothy R. Long·2019·Journal of Education in Perioperative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of the internet continues to expand, particularly in the realm of graduate medical education. Residency program directors commonly use websites to share information with applicants. As social media (SM) use grows, the role of residency-based SM accounts in recruiting prospective residents remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to delineate which SM platforms prospective anesthesia residents have accounts and which platforms they use to research anesthesia residency programs. METHODS: Following the results of the National Residency Match Program (NRMP) in March 2018, we anonymously surveyed anesthesiology resident candidates from all three Mayo Clinic residency sites and inquired about which SM platforms candidates maintain a profile, which they used to evaluate residencies, and to what degree the content influenced their decision. RESULTS: A total of 219 surveys were distributed that resulted in 89 responses (40.6%, 89/219). Most respondents have a Facebook account (94.4%, 84/89) while Doximity was the most commonly used SM platform to research programs (86.5%, 77/89). Most respondents (52.8%, 47/89) felt the presence of a residency-based SM account had an impact on their evaluation of prospective programs. Most respondents (50.5%, 45/89) used an internet search to research programs, while a large percentage (42.7%, 38/89) used a combination of internet search engines and SM platforms. CONCLUSIONS: While an internet search was the most commonly used technique to research programs, many applicants also used SM platforms. Doximity was the most commonly SM platform, however, more applicants have Facebook accounts, suggesting programs can use this platform to reach prospective applicants.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46374/volxxi-issue1-renew

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renew, J. R., Ladlie, B. L., Gorlin, A. W., & Long, T. R.
Venue
Journal of Education in Perioperative Medicine
Published
2019-01-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
E632-E632
ISSN
2333-0406 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996742243
Cited by
48
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11
FWCI
8.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Education in Perioperative Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
social media, anesthesiology residency, residency recruitment, residency program evaluation, prospective applicants, Facebook, graduate medical education, program websites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review