Meta-Analysis of American Race Differences in Intelligence
Abstract
We present a meta-analysis of 139 U.S. studies (1918–2017; N = 400,000) examining racial differences in intelligence averages and distributions. Studies were included if they used representative U.S. samples, IQ tests with at least 3 subtests, reported White reference groups, and provided sufficient statistics to compute Cohen’s d. Studies were excluded if samples were unrepresentative (e.g., elites, college-only, selective cities), duplicated, lacked general ability differences, lacked within-group SDs, lacked a White comparison group, or relied on scholastic achievement tests. Random- and mixed-effects meta-analytic models were used to estimate racial means. With the White mean set to 100, averages were 82 (Black), 89 (Hispanic/American Indian), 105 (Asian), and 109 (Jewish). Evidence indicates small study effects inflated Black mean IQs. Variances and distributions were similar across races, and there is strong evidence against convergence in intelligence between Blacks and Whites in cohorts born after 1960.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
- Authors
- Kirkegaard, E. O. W., & Jensen, S.
- Venue
- Mankind Quarterly
- Publisher
- Mankind Publishing House
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 290-300
- ISSN
- 0025-2344 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7142996766
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mankind Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Keywords
- racial differences in intelligence, IQ, IQ distribution, cohort effects, small-study effects, Asian Americans, Hispanic Americans, Native Americans, American Jews, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review