The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a typology of sampling designs for qualitative researchers. We introduce the following sampling strategies: (a) parallel sampling designs, which represent a body of sampling strategies that facilitate credible comparisons of two or more different subgroups that are extracted from the same levels of study; (b) nested sampling designs, which are sampling strategies that facilitate credible comparisons of two or more members of the same subgroup, wherein one or more members of the subgroup represent a sub-sample of the full sample; and (c) multilevel sampling designs, which represent sampling strategies that facilitate credible comparisons of two or more subgroups that are extracted from different levels of study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
WITHDRAWN - Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples
Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007) · Journal of Mixed Methods Research · doi:10.1177/2345678906292430 · Cited by 2,250
Retracted(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook
(1994) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2 · Cited by 48,420
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
Wagner, H. R., Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2575405 · Cited by 46,361
Case Study Research: Design and Methods
Chaiklin, H. (1991) · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease · doi:10.1097/00005053-199102000-00025 · Cited by 39,535
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Qualitative research and evaluation methods
Patton, M. Q. (1980) · Cited by 35,626
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
Handbook of Qualitative Research
Crozier, G., Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994) · British Journal of Educational Studies · doi:10.2307/3121684 · Cited by 26,666
(2001) · Cited by 25,534
Cited by
Validity and Qualitative Research: An Oxymoron?
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2007) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9000-3 · Cited by 832
Self-citationThe ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners
Mohamed Shaffril, H. A., Samsuddin, S. F., & Abu Samah, A. (2021) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6 · Cited by 656
Alhazmi, A. A., & Kaufmann, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.785134 · Cited by 291
Viés de desejabilidade social na pesquisa qualitativa em saúde
Bispo Júnior, J. P. (2022) · Revista de Saúde Pública · doi:10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004164 · Cited by 269
Swann, C., Crust, L., Jackman, P., Vella, S. A., Allen, M. S., & Keegan, R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200.2016.1272650 · Cited by 165
Metadata
- Authors
- Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N.
- Venue
- The Qualitative Report
- Publisher
- Nova Southeastern University
- Published
- 2015-01-15
- ISSN
- 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-3715
- OpenAlex
- W2099487684
- Cited by
- 696
- References
- 66
- FWCI
- 337.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1636
- The paper
- Onwuegbuzie, A., & Leech, N. (2015). Sampling Designs in Qualitative Research: Making the Sampling Process More Public. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1636
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
