CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 746Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsData Analysis and Archiving

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thinking about the Coding Process in Qualitative Data Analysis

Open access
Elliott, Victoria·2018·The Qualitative Report
DOI 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Coding is a ubiquitous part of the qualitative research process, but it is often under-considered in research methods training and literature. This article explores a number of questions about the coding process which are often raised by beginning researchers, in the light of the recommendations of methods textbooks and the factors which contribute to an answer to these questions. I argue for a conceptualisation of coding as a decision-making process, in which decisions about aspects of coding such as density, frequency, size of data pieces to be coded, are all made by individual researchers in line with their methodological background, their research design and research questions, and the practicalities of their study. This has implications for the way that coding is carried out by researchers at all stages of their careers, as it requires that coding decisions should be made in the context of an individual study, not once and for all.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 501–600 of 746

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Elliott, V.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Elliott, Victoria
ORCID
Elliott, Victoria
Venue
The Qualitative Report
Publisher
Nova Southeastern University
Published
2018-11-24
ISSN
  • 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-3715
DOI
10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3560
OpenAlex
W2902680660
Cited by
746
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 1
FWCI
186.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • The Qualitative Report (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
Keywords
qualitative data analysis, coding process, research design, research questions, research training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review