The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Thinking about the Coding Process in Qualitative Data Analysis
Open accessAbstract
Coding is a ubiquitous part of the qualitative research process, but it is often under-considered in research methods training and literature. This article explores a number of questions about the coding process which are often raised by beginning researchers, in the light of the recommendations of methods textbooks and the factors which contribute to an answer to these questions. I argue for a conceptualisation of coding as a decision-making process, in which decisions about aspects of coding such as density, frequency, size of data pieces to be coded, are all made by individual researchers in line with their methodological background, their research design and research questions, and the practicalities of their study. This has implications for the way that coding is carried out by researchers at all stages of their careers, as it requires that coding decisions should be made in the context of an individual study, not once and for all.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (1988) · Cited by 20,701
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
Saldaña, J. (2025) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781036235611 · Cited by 19,193
(2017) · Cited by 16,036
Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
Wuetherick, B. (2010) · Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education · doi:10.21225/d5g01t · Cited by 8,333
Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches
(2002) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-4047 · Cited by 5,622 · cited 1×
“Saldaña distinguishes between “lumpers” and “splitters” (a term he attributes to Bernard, 2011, p. 379); the former takes a “lump” or large excerpt and gives it one code; a “splitter” splits the data into smaller codable moments.”
Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research
(2002) · Analyzing Qualitative Data · doi:10.4324/9780203413081-14 · Cited by 4,964 · cited 1×
“…codes within the same piece of data may well be a useful finding: “single passages often contain a number of different themes each of which needs to be referenced; multiple indexing of this kind can begin to highlight patterns of association within the data” (Ritchie & Spencer 1994, p. 182).”
Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research
Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2010) · Analyzing qualitative data · doi:10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9 · Cited by 4,800
Goodwin, C. (1994) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 · Cited by 3,483
Qualitative data: an introduction to coding and analysis
Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4324 · Cited by 2,640
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 701–746 of 746
The Metaverse as an Emerging Technology in Educational Environments: A SWOT Analysis
Arslan, K., & Arı, A. G. (2025) · Uşak üniversitesi eğitim araştırmaları dergisi/Uşak Üniversitesi eğitim araştırmaları dergisi · doi:10.29065/usakead.1660747
Conceptualizing Entrepreneurship as Resistance: The Extreme Context of Palestine
Eid, N. L. (2026) · Palgrave studies of entrepreneurship and social challenges in developing economies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-99976-5_3
Alexander, R., Harper-Cooks, T., Kalantzis, M. A., Robles, J., Campos, A. P., Aries, X. M., Palacios, J. E., & Goode, R. W. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.91604
Rampjapedi, M. T., Adom, R. K., & Simatele, M. D. (2026) · Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association · doi:10.1080/10962247.2026.2624799
“Thematic analysis is the common technique used to analyze qualitative data sets by identifying themes to gain new knowledge and understanding (Thomas 2006; Elliott 2018).”
Chapter 6: Qualitative Analysis of the 2021 Life Care Planning Costing Technique Survey
Thomas, L. B., Pahl, L. J., Anderson, L., Dunlap, K., Gibbs, R. L., Holt, J., & Masterson, J. (2026) · Journal of Life Care Planning · doi:10.70385/001c.155952
Craigmyle, J., OConnell, E., Bailey, R. J., Gay, L., Penilton, D., & Woodard, L. (2026) · Journal of Life Care Planning · doi:10.70385/001c.155377
Bos, D., Hilberdink, C. E., Smeets, K., & Djelantik, A. A. A. M. J. (2025) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf101
Evaluating South Texas Local Government Responses and Managerial Roles During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Haruna, P. F., & Zvobgo, V. (2026) · State and Local Government Review · doi:10.1177/0160323x261423240
“Elliott (2018) states that this method is used in qualitative research to identify and interpret patterns or themes within a dataset, helping to uncover new insights and understanding.”
Ebbert, D., Mirriahi, N., Wilson, N. J., Korolkiewicz, M. W., Fewster–Young, N., Lloyd, A., Costabile, M., Joksimovíc, S., & Dawson, S. (2026) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-026-09458-0
Adopting an AI-Assisted Thematic Approach
McTaggart, V., & McCarthy, J. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-0434-0.ch002
Stakeholders’ Influence in Shaping Sustainability Practices for Nordic Space SMEs
Tangem, S., de Melo, E., & Ojala, A. (2026) · management revue · doi:10.31083/mrev38695
A Usability Evaluation of an E-Commerce Checkout System Using SUS and Usability Testing
Pahlevi, R. D., & Santoso, H. B. (2026) · International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems · doi:10.59395/ijadis.v7i1.1498
“Quantitative analysis used the SUS to convert Likert responses into standardized scores [20].”
Puspitasari, N. D., Murwaningsih, T., & Adi, F. P. (2025) · Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar · doi:10.23887/jisd.v9i4.103356
Sukamto, N. P., Murwaningsih, T., & Chumdari (2025) · Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar · doi:10.23887/jisd.v9i4.103334
Singh, S. S., Bogachov, M., & Proyer, M. (2026) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2026.2664782
Jennings, S., McCorkle, L. S., Smith, J., & Shelden, M. L. (2026) · Topics in Early Childhood Special Education · doi:10.1177/02711214261443655
Veta, O. D., & McLaughlin, H. (2026) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2026.2670700
Hierarchy-Aware Heterogeneous Graph Neural Network for Occupation Title Coding
Xie, Y., & Zhu, W. (2026) · Journal of Official Statistics · doi:10.1177/0282423x261436204
“To be analyzed, these answers usually have to be coded or aggregated into predefined categorical occupation systems (Elliott 2018).”
Ishabisa, A., & Maro, C. N. (2026) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-026-01460-2
“The study adopted the analysis steps provided by Elliott ( 2018).”
Richards, K., & Hussey, E. (2026) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2026.2672154
From Manual Coding to Machine Insight
Sharma, K., & Kaur, H. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-7640-0.ch010
Peppler, L., Feißt, M., Apelt, M., & Schenk, L. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04854-y
“In line with the reconstructive logic of the documentary method, our coding framework was designed to be non-exclusive, allowing for the multidimensionality of nursing practice to be captured [27].”
Nkosi, T. B., & Moyo, Z. (2026) · International Journal of Leadership in Education · doi:10.1080/13603124.2026.2685491
“The identical tags that were employed in the interview transcripts were also applied to the material of the documents (Elliott, 2018).”
Mardhiah, N., Husna, C. A., Omalia, N., Mursyidin, Wiranatakusuma, D. B., & Muhammad, Z. (2026) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6415-6_17
Promoting traditional leisure: barriers and enablers for the mindsport bridge
McCutcheon, A., & Punch, S. (2026) · Leisure Studies · doi:10.1080/02614367.2026.2692685
Hatakeyama, T., Miyazaki, F., Otsuka, A., Yatagawa, R., & Kurishima, H. (2026) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104438
Misiejuk, K., López‐Pernas, S., de Oliveira, E. A., Eagan, B., & Saqr, M. (2026) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2026.100649
E-commerce, servitization and digital transformation in the automotive industry
Pérez-Moure, H., Lampón, J. F., Crespo-Velando, M. Á., & Rodríguez-Domínguez, M. D. M. (2026) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-026-10170-z
Malcolm, Z., Bohnet, I. C., Bryce, R., Måren, I. E., Östman, S. A. H., Buchtele, R., Külm, S., Kokovkin, T., & Taylor, S. (2026) · International Journal of Heritage Studies · doi:10.1080/13527258.2026.2703495
Mehran, J., Kristensson, P., & Shams, P. (2026) · Journal of Service Theory and Practice · doi:10.1108/jstp-03-2025-0075
“Two researchers independently coded the empirical material and reconciled interpretations through iterative discussion, supporting transparency and robustness (Elliott, 2018).”
Novario, G., Morris, L., Schmeler, M. R., & Ding, D. (2026) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2026.2709899
Khamis, N., Romdhane, S. B., & Lee, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2026.1854813
“To enhance analytic rigor, decisions regarding aspects of coding such as density, frequency, size of data pieces to be coded (Elliott, 2018) were made collaboratively.”
Steinberg, S., Zou, X., Humburg, M., Hmelo‐Silver, C. E., Danish, J. A., Glazewski, K. D., Rowe, J., & Lester, J. C. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1833627
Alanazi, M. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1901716
Ison, M. P. (2026) · Journal of Education Policy · doi:10.1080/02680939.2026.2724915
Bartholdson, C., Bennesved, A., Wenemark, M., Grönlund, C. F., Bremer, A., Brännström, M., Pergert, P., & Svantesson, M. (2026) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/s12910-026-01573-6
“Responses from the open-ended inquiry were reviewed and consolidated by identifying overlapping or redundant descriptions [40].”
García, G. A., Santos, N. J., Meza, A., Chic, D. D., & Yee, C. (2026) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2026.2715730
Marquiño, E. V. V., & Basas, A. A. (2026) · Scientia - The International Journal on the Liberal Arts · doi:10.57106/scientia.v15i2.227
Jiang, M., & Han, C. (2026) · Language Assessment Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15434303.2026.2744761
“To provide a comprehensive view of code frequency and coverage (Elliott, 2018), we presented descriptive statistics on segment frequencies ( n s : the number of segments per category) and corresponding participant counts ( n r : the number of raters who reported each category).”
Jenkins, S. C., & Osman, M. (2026) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2026.2722629
“This helps to ensure that there is a reliable mapping of any coding of qualitative data, and can be used to check consistency across different coding levels (e.g. superordinate, sub-ordinate) (Elliott 2018).”
Khan, Z., Seiyad, H., Jacob, K., Arhinson, A., Olure, B., Paller, V., Williams, A., Meherali, S. M., Ennis, M., & Munro, S. B. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-108350
“Participants represented diverse and often mixed racial and cultural groups, such as self-identifying as Caribbean and Black African, European and West Asian.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Elliott, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Elliott, Victoria
- ORCID
- Elliott, Victoria
- Venue
- The Qualitative Report
- Publisher
- Nova Southeastern University
- Published
- 2018-11-24
- ISSN
- 1052-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-3715
- OpenAlex
- W2902680660
- Cited by
- 746
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 47 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 110 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 126 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 186.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-sa
- Locations
- The Qualitative Report (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Data Analysis and Archiving
- Keywords
- qualitative data analysis, coding process, research design, research questions, research training
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review