Manufacturing of CAR-T cells using in-house vectors and the CliniMACS Prodigy
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: This article provides a practical, regulatory-focused guide for the clinical-grade manufacturing of autologous CAR-T cells using in-house lentiviral vectors and the CliniMACS Prodigy system. Methods: A narrative review and technical synthesis of the scientific literature, institutional manufacturing workflows, platform-specific protocols, and Brazilian and international regulatory documents were performed. Results: The detailed process includes leukapheresis, receipt of the material, chain-of-identity and chain-of-custody controls, and initial testing of the starting material, including total nucleated cell count, CD3+ cell content, viability, and microbiological screening. The Prodigy system utilizes automated modules for magnetic T-cell enrichment, CD3/CD28 activation, lentiviral transduction, cell expansion, harvesting, formulation, and cryopreservation. Operational conduct can affect reproducibility, starting material quality, transduction efficiency, and the cell culture process. Final product release is conditional on comprehensive quality control, and coordination among the laboratories is essential. Accordingly, quality assurance procedures, deviation and corrective and preventive action management, process validation, and traceability constitute essential components in a manufacturing center. Conclusion: Integrating manufacturing and quality procedures within a structured workflow facilitates platform standardization and automation, hence promoting consistent CAR-T-cell production.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This narrative review and technical synthesis describes clinical-grade manufacturing of autologous CAR-T cells using in-house lentiviral vectors and the CliniMACS Prodigy platform, from leukapheresis through final product release. It emphasizes quality assurance, in-process controls, traceability, process validation, and regulatory compliance for academic or resource-diverse cellular therapy centers.
Key findings
- The manufacturing workflow includes leukapheresis, acceptance testing (total nucleated cell count, CD3+ content, viability, sterility), automated T-cell enrichment, CD3/CD28 activation, lentiviral transduction, expansion for approximately 7 to 10 days, harvesting, formulation, and cryopreservation.
- Final release QC includes identity/purity by flow cytometry, viability typically requiring at least 70% by 7-AAD or equivalent, potency assays such as cytotoxicity or cytokine release, and safety testing for sterility, endotoxin, mycoplasma, and replication-competent lentivirus (RCL).
- Operational parameters reported include leukapheresis processed volume usually 1 to 3 total blood volumes, storage at 2–8 °C, transport at 2–24 °C, cryopreservation at or below −150 °C, and cryoprotectant solutions supplemented with 5–10% DMSO when used.
- Transduction efficiency can vary between patients and manufacturing runs due to starting-material composition, T-cell fitness and activation status, vector architecture, multiplicity of infection, culture density, or timing of vector addition; QA, COI/COC, IPC, deviation/CAPA management, and process validation are described as essential.
Methods
- A narrative review and technical synthesis of the scientific literature, institutional manufacturing workflows, platform-specific protocols, and Brazilian and international regulatory documents.
- No primary experimental data, patient sample, systematic search, or meta-analysis is described; the article presents a practical workflow and QC/QA framework.
- Regulatory sources cited include Anvisa Resolutions No. 505/2021, No. 506/2021, and No. 836/2021, U.S. FDA CMC guidance for gene-modified cellular therapies, and FACT-JACIE international standards.
Limitations
- Stated in the paper: potency assays vary substantially across institutions in target cell lines, effector-to-target ratios, and incubation periods, limiting interlaboratory comparability; implementation of automation and non-viral approaches remains limited by infrastructure requirements, validation costs, supply chain stability, and staff training; academic or resource-limited centers may face additional cleanroom capacity and regulatory expertise challenges.
- Evident from the text: as a narrative review and technical synthesis, it reports no primary outcome data, no systematic search methodology, and no empirical validation of the proposed workflow or comparative performance results.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 35 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Premisecitation
Manufacturing centers have faced challenges integrating CAR-T-cell manufacturing into reliable clinical processes, particularly with in-house lentiviral vectors.
“Manufacturing centers have faced challenges in integrating CAR-T-cell manufacturing into reliable clinical processes, particularly when using in-house lentiviral vectors.4,5”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [5]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The degree of T-cell enrichment directly influences subsequent steps in CAR-T cell manufacturing, including transduction efficiency.
“The degree of enrichment directly influences subsequent steps in CAR-T cell manufacturing, including transduction efficiency.20”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Academic and resource-limited centers may encounter additional challenges related to cleanroom capacity and regulatory expertise.
“Academic and resource-limited centers may encounter additional challenges related to cleanroom capacity and regulatory expertise.37”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [37]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisenone given
Potency assays vary substantially across institutions in target cell lines, effector-to-target ratios, incubation periods, and other aspects.
“However, these assays vary substantially across institutions in target cell lines (NALM6, NAMALWA, etc.), effector-to-target ratios, incubation periods, and other aspects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning
Implementation of automation and non-viral engineering remains limited by infrastructure requirements, validation costs, supply chain stability, and staff training.
“Despite the promise of automation and non-viral engineering, implementation remains limited by infrastructure requirements, validation costs, supply chain stability, and staff training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Premisecitation
Safety product evaluation includes determination of sterility, endotoxin, mycoplasma, and replication-competent lentivirus (RCL).
“Among the evaluations are the determination of sterility, endotoxin, mycoplasma, and replication-competent lentivirus (RCL).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The CliniMACS Prodigy platform delivers a reproducible, standardized approach suitable for resource-constrained settings.
“For centers initiating CAR-T manufacturing programs, primarily in hematopoietic cell transplantation settings, the platform delivers a reproducible, standardized approach suitable for resourceconstrained settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 34
- May combine two claims. 13
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCritical process parameters are present at every step of the manufacturing process.
“Critical process parameters are present at every step of the manufacturing process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis variation limits interlaboratory comparability and highlights the need for assay validation and harmonized reporting strategies.
“This variation limits interlaboratory comparability and highlights the need for assay validation and harmonized reporting strategies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransduction efficiency can vary considerably between patients and across manufacturing runs.
“Transduction efficiency can vary considerably between patients and across manufacturing runs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAutomated closed systems such as the CliniMACS Prodigy can mitigate these challenges by reducing manual handling, standardizing procedures, and enhancing traceability.
“Automated closed systems such as the CliniMACS Prodigy can mitigate these challenges by reducing manual handling, standardizing procedures, and enhancing traceability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThis difference in transduction efficiency frequently results from differences in starting-material composition, T-cell fitness and activation status, vector architecture, multiplicity of infection, culture density, or timing of vector addition.
“This difference frequently results from differences in starting-material composition, T-cell fitness and activation status, vector architecture, multiplicity of infection, culture density, or timing of vector addition.21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [21]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationNon-viral gene delivery approaches, including transposon systems, mRNA electroporation, and CRISPR-based engineering, are gaining attention as strategies to lower dependence on viral vectors, optimize regulatory pathways, and reduce manufacturing costs.
“In parallel, non-viral gene delivery approaches, including transposon systems such as Sleeping Beauty, mRNA electroporation, and CRISPR-based engineering, are gaining attention as strategies to lower dependence on viral vectors, optimize regulatory pathways, and reduce manufacturing costs.[34][35][36]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [34]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [35]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [36]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenSerology or nucleic acid tests for infectious diseases are primarily based on institutional clinical protocols.
“It is evident from many publications that serology or nucleic acid tests for infectious diseases are primarily based on institutional clinical protocols.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenViability, lymphocyte markers, and sterility are key acceptance parameters.
“Viability, lymphocyte markers, and sterility are key acceptance parameters.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenThe quality of the apheresis product strongly determines the final yield.
“The quality of the apheresis product strongly determines the final yield.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn-house vectors are commonly based on second- or third-generation lentiviral systems, which have been used for clinical-grade gene transfer because of their safety features, reduced risk, and suitability for stable transgene expression.
“In-house vectors may vary in design but are commonly based on second-or third-generation lentiviral systems, which have been used for clinical-grade gene transfer because of their safety features, reduced risk, and suitability for stable transgene expression.3,6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLentiviral vectors must undergo predefined QC testing, including functional titer, sterility, endotoxin, mycoplasma, and other quality parameters.
“Regardless of the supplier, lentiviral vectors must undergo predefined QC testing, including assessments of functional titer, sterility, endotoxin, mycoplasma, and other quality parameters.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationCAR-T cell manufacturing requires complex, coordinated, time-sensitive steps involving apheresis, cell processing, QC laboratories, and clinical teams.
“Manufacturing CAR-T cells requires a series of complex, carefully coordinated, and time-sensitive steps involving apheresis, cell processing, quality control (QC) laboratories, and clinical teams.3”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe processed volume for leukapheresis usually ranges from 1 to 3 total blood volumes, with adjustments based on patient weight, peripheral blood counts, vascular access, and institutional protocols.
“The processed volume usually ranges from 1 to 3 total blood volumes, with adjustments based on patient weight, peripheral blood counts, vascular access, and institutional protocols.13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPoint-of-care manufacturing models are gaining attention because they may shorten manufacturing time, reduce logistical complexity, and improve access for patients treated outside large industrial manufacturing networks.
“Point-of-care manufacturing models are also gaining attention because they may shorten manufacturing time, reduce logistical complexity, and improve access for patients treated outside large industrial manufacturing networks.33”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationProcess validation includes equipment qualification and calibration, supplier qualification, validation of all analytical methods, cryopreservation procedures, and shipping conditions.
“This includes several aspects of the entire productive chain, such as equipment qualification and calibration, supplier qualification, validation of all analytical methods, cryopreservation procedures, and shipping conditions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [31]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [32]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRegulatory rules relevant to CAR-T manufacturing in Brazil include Anvisa Resolution No. 505/2021 and No. 506/2021 for advanced therapy products, Resolution No. 836/2021 for GMP, and institutional biosafety requirements.
“Regulatory rules relevant to CAR-T manufacturing in Brazil include Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (Anvisa) Resolution No. 505/2021 and No. 506/2021 for advanced therapy products, Resolution No. 836/2021 for good manufacturing practices (GMP), and institutional biosafety requirements.[8][9][10][11]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [10]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [11]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningIn academic or low-resource institutions, implementing robust QC can be very difficult, as it requires validated assays, trained personnel, qualified equipment, documented controls, and clear decision-making procedures for out-of-specification or atypical results.
“In this sense, in academic or low-resource institutions, implementing robust QC can be very difficult, as it requires validated assays, trained personnel, qualified equipment, documented controls, and clear decisionmaking procedures for out-of-specification or atypical results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenProducts manufactured from heavily pretreated patients may present reduced cell proliferation, altered CD4/CD8 ratios, lower transduction efficiency, or increased expression of exhaustion markers.
“Products manufactured from heavily pretreated patients may present reduced cell proliferation, altered CD4/CD8 ratios, lower transduction efficiency, or increased expression of exhaustion markers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationStandard testing of starting material commonly involves measuring total nucleated cell count, CD3+ T-cell count, other lymphocyte markers, cell viability, and sterility.
“Standard testing commonly involves measuring total nucleated cell count, CD3+ T-cell count, other lymphocyte markers, cell viability, and sterility.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationSince CAR-T cells are autologous, maintaining chain-of-identity and chain-of-custody is essential at every step.
“Since CAR-T cells are autologous, maintaining the COI and the COC is essential at every step.17,18”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [18]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationElectronic records can reduce transcription errors and enable real-time review, but require validated systems, controlled access, and data integrity procedures.
“Electronic records are useful and can be used in order to reduce transcription errors and enable real-time review, but they require validated systems, controlled access, and data integrity procedures.27”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenQA and IPC provide consistency, safety, traceability, and regulatory conformance throughout cell manufacturing.
“QA and IPC provide the consistency, safety, traceability, and regulatory conformance throughout cell manufacturing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenRelease criteria may vary according to the manufacturing platform, clinical protocol, regulatory pathway, and whether the product is fresh or cryopreserved.
“Release criteria may vary according to the manufacturing platform, clinical protocol, regulatory pathway, and whether the product is fresh or cryopreserved.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationQC tests for CAR-T cell products must be rapid and reliable.
“QC tests for CAR-T cell products must be rapid and reliable.17”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe workflow underlying CAR-T cell manufacturing is fundamentally consistent across systems and laboratories in general terms, including the use of the CliniMACS Prodigy system.
“The workflow underlying CAR-T cell manufacturing is fundamentally consistent across systems and laboratories in general terms (Fig. 1), including the use of the CliniMACS Prodigy system.19”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenCell viability at product release typically requires values of at least 70%, determined by flow cytometry using viability dyes such as 7-AAD or equivalent reagents.
“Another feature is cell viability, assessed at the time of product release, and typically requires values of at least 70%, determined by flow cytometry using viability dyes such as 7-AAD or equivalent reagents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAccording to Brazilian resolutions, collected leukapheresis material should be stored at 2-8 °C, with transport maintained at 2-24 °C.
“According to Brazilian resolutions, 8,15 the collected material should be stored at 2-8 °C, with transport maintained at 2-24 °C.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [15]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone givenExpansion failure or poor growth may occur because of heavily pretreated patients (inefficient washout), low CD3+ input, reduced cell viability, or high monocyte or granulocyte contamination in the starting material.
“Nevertheless, expansion failure or poor growth may occur, for example, because of heavily pretreated patients (inefficient washout), low CD3+ input, reduced cell viability, or high monocyte or granulocyte contamination in the starting material.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCell culture expansion depends on factors including nutrient availability, cytokine supplementation, stable pH and gas exchange, control of cell density, and the proliferative capacity of the patient-derived T-cell population.
“Cell culture expansion depends on different factors, including nutrient availability, cytokine supplementation, stable pH and gas exchange, control of cell density, and the proliferative capacity of the patient-derived T-cell population.13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOne advantage of closed systems compared with conventional open systems is reduced operator-skill dependence and lower contamination risks, which lead to more consistent manufacturing outcomes.
“Also, one of the advantages of closed systems, compared with conventional open systems, is reduced operator-skill dependence and lower contamination risks, which lead to more consistent manufacturing outcomes.23”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [23]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenThe quality of the leukapheresis product is a critical determinant of manufacturing outcomes, as factors such as lymphopenia, elevated tumor burden, recent chemotherapy, ongoing infections, corticosteroid exposure, and other factors can affect CAR-T cell manufacturing.
“In parallel, the quality of the leukapheresis product is a critical determinant of manufacturing outcomes, as factors such as lymphopenia, elevated tumor burden, recent chemotherapy, ongoing infections, corticosteroid exposure, and other factors can affect CAR-T cell manufacturing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone givenInternational guidelines such as FDA CMC guidance and FACT-JACIE Standards support harmonization of best practices.
“International guidelines, such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Control guidance for genemodified cellular therapies, and the Foundation for the Accreditation of Cellular Therapy-Joint Accreditation Committee International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy-Europe & European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Standards further support the harmonization”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPotency testing remains one of the most challenging aspects of CAR-T-cell product release.
“Potency testing remains one of the most challenging aspects of CAR-T-cell product release.24”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [24]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone givenTraceability is essential due to the autologous nature of CAR-T products.
“Traceability is essential due to the autologous nature of CAR-T products.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCommon deviations in CAR-T manufacturing include temperature excursions, delayed processing, labeling inconsistencies, incomplete documentation, reagent preparation errors, equipment alarms, flow occlusions, partial failures of automated steps, out-of-range cell densities, low transduction efficiencies, and microbial contamination.
“Common deviations include temperature excursions during transport or storage, delayed processing, labeling inconsistencies, incomplete documentation, reagent preparation errors, unexpected equipment alarms, flow occlusions, partial failures of automated steps, out-of-range cell densities, low transduction efficiencies, and microbial contamination.29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Resolution 836 is assigned two different years
MinorThe text identifies Resolution No. 836 as a 2021 regulation, but reference 15 dates Resolution 836 to December 2023.
“Resolution No. 836/2021 for good manufacturing practices (GMP)”
“Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada -RDC nº 836, de 13 de dezembro de 2023.”
Cites
Chimeric Antigen Receptor Therapy
June, C. H., & Sadelain, M. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1706169 · Cited by 2,355 · see citing works
Clinical use of lentiviral vectors
Milone, M. C., & O’Doherty, U. (2018) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/s41375-018-0106-0 · Cited by 930 · see citing works
Global Manufacturing of CAR T Cell Therapy
Levine, B. L., Miskin, J., Wonnacott, K., & Keir, C. (2017) · Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2016.12.006 · Cited by 765 · see citing works
Clinical manufacturing of CAR T cells: foundation of a promising therapy
Wang, X., & Rivière, I. (2016) · Molecular Therapy - Oncolytics · doi:10.1038/mto.2016.15 · Cited by 637 · see citing works
From bench to bedside: the history and progress of CAR T cell therapy
Mitra, A., Barua, A., Huang, L., Ganguly, S., Feng, Q. F., & He, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1188049 · Cited by 493 · see citing works
CAR-T cell therapy for cancer: current challenges and future directions
Zugasti, I., Espinosa-Aroca, L., Fidyt, K., Mulens‐Arias, V., Díaz‐Beyá, M., Juan, M., Urbano-Ispizúa, Á., Esteve, J., Velasco-Hernández, T., & Menéndez, P. R. (2025) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-025-02269-w · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T Cells for Cancer Immunotherapy
Abou-el-Enein, M., Elsallab, M., Feldman, S. A., Fesnak, A. D., Heslop, H. E., Marks, P., Till, B. G., Bauer, G., & Savoldo, B. (2021) · Blood Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2643-3230.bcd-21-0084 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
CAR-T cell manufacturing: Major process parameters and next-generation strategies
Ceja, M. A., Khericha, M., Harris, C., Puig-Saus, C., & Chen, Y. (2024) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20230903 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Mock, U., Nickolay, L., Philip, B., Cheung, G. W.-K., Zhan, H., Johnston, I. C. D., Kaiser, A. D., Peggs, K., Pule, M., Thrasher, A. J., et al. (2016) · Cytotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2016.05.009 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Lei, T., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Cao, J., Huang, J., Chen, J., Chen, H., Zhang, J., wang, L., et al. (2024) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/s41375-024-02444-y · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Automated manufacture of autologous CD19 CAR-T cells for treatment of non-hodgkin lymphoma
Jackson, Z., Roe, A., Sharma, A. A., Lopes, F. B. T. P., Talla, A., Kleinsorge-Block, S., Zamborsky, K., Schiavone, J., Manjappa, S., Schauner, R., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01941 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Baguet, C., Larghero, J., & Mebarki, M. (2023) · Blood Advances · doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011992 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Palani, H. K., Arunachalam, A. K., Yasar, M., Venkatraman, A., Kulkarni, U., Lionel, S. A., Selvarajan, S., Korula, A., Abraham, A., George, B., et al. (2023) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/s41409-022-01866-5 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Production of CAR T-cells by GMP-grade lentiviral vectors: latest advances and future prospects
Poorebrahim, M., Sadeghi, S., Fakhr, E., Abazari, M. F., Poortahmasebi, V., Kheirollahi, A., Askari, H., Rajabzadeh, A., Rastegarpanah, M., Linē, A., et al. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408363.2019.1633512 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Non-viral chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells going viral
Balke-Want, H., Keerthi, V., Cadinanos-Garai, A., Fowler, C., Gkitsas, N., Brown, A. K., Tunuguntla, R. H., Abouelenein, M., & Feldman, S. A. (2023) · Immuno-Oncology Technology · doi:10.1016/j.iotech.2023.100375 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Improving CAR T cell therapy by optimizing critical quality attributes
Reddy, O. L., Stroncek, D. F., & Panch, S. R. (2020) · Seminars in Hematology · doi:10.1053/j.seminhematol.2020.07.005 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Noaks, E., Peticone, C., Kotsopoulou, E., & Bracewell, D. G. (2021) · Molecular Therapy - Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2021.02.002 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Viganò, M., Budelli, S., Lavazza, C., et al. (2018) · Stem Cells International · doi:10.1155/2018/3038565 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Gupta, D., & Shaz, B. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06400-x · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Formulation Considerations for Autologous T Cell Drug Products
van der Walle, C. F., Godbert, S., Saito, G., et al. (2021) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13081317 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Marton, C., Clémenceau, B., Dachy, G., Demerle, C., Derenne, S., Ferrand, C., Giverne, C., Latouche, J.-B., Lemée, L., Martinet, J., et al. (2025) · Bone Marrow Transplantation · doi:10.1038/s41409-025-02637-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Shi, J., Yang, J., Zheng, Y., Wong, P. H. H., Hu, H., & Ung, C. O. L. (2025) · Molecular Therapy — Methods & Clinical Development · doi:10.1016/j.omtm.2025.101485 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
The management of good manufacturing practice (GMP) inspections: a scoping review of the evidence
Azawei, A. A., Loughrey, K., Surim, K., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1687864 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Point-of-Care Production of CAR-T Cells
Delgado, J., Roddie, C., & Schmitt, M. W. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-94353-0_8 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Analysis of the measurements used as potency tests for the 31 US FDA-approved cell therapy products
Simon, C. G., Bozenhardt, E. H., Celluzzi, C. M., Dobnik, D., Grant, M., Lakshmipathy, U., Nebel, T., Peltier, L., Ratcliffe, A., Sherley, J. L., et al. (2025) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-06253-4 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
von der Leyen, H. E., Delgado, J., Mazouz, C., Schmitt, M. W., & Caplan, V. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1591751 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Lavazza, C., Budelli, S., Montelatici, E., et al. (2022) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-021-03200-x · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Increasing Production Efficiency Through Electronic Batch Record Systems: A Case Study
Marsh, J. L., & Eyers, D. R. (2016) · Smart innovation, systems and technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-32098-4_23 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Arunagiri, T., Kannaiah, K. P., & Vasanthan, M. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.69762 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Mukherjee, S., Reddy, O. L., Panch, S. R., et al. (2021) · Transfusion and Apheresis Science · doi:10.1016/j.transci.2021.103066 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Regulatory landscape for CAR-T therapy development in the Brazilian context
Mesquita, F. P., Maia, M. S., Souza, P. F. N., Carvalho, L. E. M., Carlos, L. M. D. B., & DUARTE, F. B. (2026) · Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy · doi:10.1080/14737140.2026.2617956 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Kerbauy, L. N., & Mesquita, F. P.
- Affiliations
- Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein (BR)
- Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
- Venue
- JOURNAL OF BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY
- Published
- 2026-07-31
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 2675-374X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7171942275
- Semantic Scholar
- 8d5e79e1fa9002dac5657676a5136ebf33103ac4
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- JOURNAL OF BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (311190/2026-0)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
- Keywords
- CAR T cell manufacturing, lentiviral vectors, CliniMACS Prodigy, autologous CAR T cells, leukapheresis, lentiviral transduction, cell expansion, cryopreservation, quality control, process validation, traceability, corrective and preventive actions, regulatory compliance, cell therapy manufacturing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review