CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Exploring the Role of Generative AI in Enhancing Language Learning: Opportunities and Challenges

Open access
Creely, Edwin·2024·International Journal of Changes in Education
DOI 10.47852/bonviewijce42022495
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Contemporary advances in generative AI technology have sparked considerable interest regarding its application in language education. This article explores the innovative impact that AI-powered linguistic educational tools may have, such as customized learning journeys, dynamic content, and individualized feedback mechanisms, which collectively have the potential to enhance language acquisition. At the same time, it is important to recognize the constraints associated with such technologies. Concern about maintaining precision and genuineness within AI-crafted language texts is an issue in the literature. There is also caution about AI’s current inclination to standardize language expression and to propagate limited cultural narratives, alongside the risks of overreliance on technology which may diminish analytical thought and inventiveness. This article examines the ethical considerations involving generative AI, such as the authenticity of creative work and the ownership of intellectual output. Emphasizing the necessity for clarity and conscientiousness in the application of AI, this conceptual article outlines the opportunities, limitations, and ethical concerns associated with generative AI in language instruction. This article advocates for a well-rounded strategy that leverages the positive aspects of generative AI within language education, while also addressing possible drawbacks and championing an ethical and equitable approach to language learning in the emerging AI-centric digital landscape. A model for forging thinking in this new research and practice space is offered to synthesize many of the possibilities of generative AI in language education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.47852/bonviewijce42022495

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reviews targeting language education typically focus on potential benefits, affordances, challenges, future directions, attitudes, and overview of current state.

    “Reviews targeting language education typically focus on the potential benefits, affordances, challenges, future directions for AI applications, attitudes toward AI, and an overview of the current state of research.”

    From Generative AI in Language Education: Bridging Divide and Fostering Inclusivity (2025) · cites this paper as Creely, 2024

    The Abstract and Section 3 describe this conceptual article’s focus on benefits, affordances, limitations, and ethical challenges of generative AI in language education. They do not establish what reviews in the field typically cover, and the cited passages do not show this article examining attitudes toward AI or surveying the current state of research. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

  • Reviews targeting language education do not concentrate exclusively on how GenAI can be leveraged to narrow educational gaps and promote inclusivity in language education.

    “However, they do not concentrate exclusively on how GenAI can be leveraged to narrow educational gaps and promote inclusivity in language education-an area that warrants further exploration.”

    From Generative AI in Language Education: Bridging Divide and Fostering Inclusivity (2025) · cites this paper as Creely, 2024

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Ahuja, K., Diddee, H., Hada, R., Ochieng, M., Ramesh, K., Jain, P., ... & Sitaram, S. (2023). Mega: Multilingual evaluation of generative ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.12528. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.12528 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Boden, M. A. (2018). Artificial intelligence: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Bown, O. (2012). Generative and adaptive creativity: A unified approach to creativity in nature, humans and machines. In J. McCormack & M. d'Inverno (Eds.), Computers and Creativity (pp. 361-381). Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31727- 9_14 · DOI
  4. Bozkurt, A., Karadeniz, A., Baneres, D., Guerrero-Roldán, A. E., & Rodríguez, M. E. (2021). Artificial intelligence and reflections from educational landscape: A review of AI Studies in half a century. Sustainability, 13(2), 800. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020800 · DOI
  5. Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2023). Challenging the status quo and exploring the new boundaries in the age of algorithms: Reimagining the role of generative AI in distance education and online learning. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7755273 · DOI
  6. Craig, C. J. (2022). The AI-copyright challenge: Tech- neutrality, authorship, and the public interest. In Research handbook on intellectual property and artificial intelligence (pp. 134-155). USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800881907.00013 · DOI
  7. Creely, E., Henriksen, D., Crawford, R., & Henderson, M. (2021). Exploring creative risk-taking and productive failure in classroom practice. A case study of the perceived self-efficacy and agency of teachers at one school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 42, 100951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100951 · DOI
  8. Creely, E. (2023). Conceiving creativity and learning in a world of artificial intelligence: A thinking model. In D. Henriksen & P. Mishra (Eds.), Creative provocations: Speculations on the future of creativity, technology & learning (pp. 35-50). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14549-0_3 · DOI
  9. de Vasconcellos, S., da Silva Freitas, J., Junges, F. (2021). Digital capabilities: Bridging the gap between creativity and performance. In S. H. Park, M. A. Gonzalez-Perez, & D. E. Floriani (Eds), The Palgrave Handbook of Corporate Sustainability in the Digital Era. (pp. 411-427). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42412-1_21 · DOI
  10. Eshraghian, J. K. (2020). Human ownership of artificial creativity. Nature Machine Intelligence, 2(3), 157-160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-0161-x · DOI
  11. Ferrara, E. (2023). Fairness and Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, and Mitigation Strategies. SSRN Preprint: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4615421 · DOI
  12. Galaczi, E. (2023). English language education in the era of generative AI: our perspective. UK: Cambridge University Press and Assessment. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/685411- english-language-education-in-the-era-of-generative- ai-our-perspective.pdf
  13. Yu, H., & Guo, Y. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence empowers educational reform: current status, issues, and prospects. Frontiers in Education, 8:1183162 https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1183162 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Horvatić, D., & Lipic, T. (2021). Human-centric AI: the symbiosis of human and artificial intelligence. Entropy, 23(3), 332. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23030332 · DOI
  15. Humble, N., & Mozelius, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education -A promise, a threat or a hype. In Proceedings of the european conference on the impact of artificial intelligence and robotics, 149-156.
  16. Inevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021). A review of feedback models and theories: Descriptions, definitions, and conclusions. Frontiers in Education, 6: 720195. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.720195 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Köstler, L., & Ossewaarde, R. (2022). The making of AI society: AI futures frames in German political and media discourses. AI & society, 37(1), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01161-9 · DOI
  18. Kruk, M. & Peterson, M. (Eds.). (2020). New Technological Applications for Foreign and Second Language Learning and Teaching. Pennsylvania: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2591-3 · DOI
  19. Kushner, E. (2003). English as global language: problems, dangers, opportunities. Diogenes, 50(2), 17- 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0392192103050002002 · DOI
  20. Liu, B. (2021). In AI we trust? Effects of agency locus and transparency on uncertainty reduction in human -AI interaction. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 26(6), 384-402. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmab013 · DOI · Paper page
  21. MacDonald, M. N., Badger, R., & Dasli, M. (2006). Authenticity, culture and language learning. Language and intercultural communication, 6(3-4), 250-261. https://doi.org/10.2167/laic252. · DOI
  22. Major, L., Francis, G. A., & Tsapali, M. (2021). The effectiveness of technology -supported personalised learning in low -and middle -income countries: A meta -analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(5), 1935-1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13116 · DOI
  23. Mikalef, P., & Gupta, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence capability: Conceptualization, measurement calibration, and empirical study on its impact on organizational creativity and firm performance. Information & Management, 58(3), 103434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2021.103434 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mhlanga, D. (2023a). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. In FinTech and Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development: The Role of Smart Technologies in Achieving Development Goals (pp. 387-409). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37776-1_17 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Mhlanga, D. (2023b). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. In FinTech and Artificial Intelligence for Sustainable Development: The Role of Smart Technologies in Achieving Development Goals (pp. 387-409). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37776-1_17 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Moruzzi, C. (2021). Measuring creativity: an account of natural and artificial creativity. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00313-w · DOI
  27. Nassaji, H., & Kartchava, E. (2021). Corrective Feedback in Second Language Teaching and Learning. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Corrective Feedback in Second Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 1-20). UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108589789.001 · DOI
  28. Padget, S. (Ed.). (2013). Creativity and critical thinking. New York: Routledge.
  29. Peeters, M. M., van Diggelen, J., Van Den Bosch, K., Bronkhorst, A., Neerincx, M. A., Schraagen, J. M., & Raaijmakers, S. (2021). Hybrid collective intelligence in a human -AI society. AI & society, 36, 217-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01005-y · DOI · Paper page
  30. Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135- 153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Renau, M. L. (2016). A review of the traditional and current language teaching methods. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 3(2), 82-88.
  32. Sanders, N., & Wood, J. (2021). Combining humans and machines in an emerging form of enterprise: the Humachine. Foresight: The International Journal of Applied Forecasting, 61, 28-35.
  33. Schober, R. (2022). Passing the Turing test? AI generated poetry and posthuman creativity. Artificial Intelligence and Human Enhancement: Affirmative and Critical Approaches in the Humanities, 21, 151. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110770216-009 · DOI
  34. Schwartz, O. (2018). Competing visions for AI: Turing, Licklider and generative literature. Digital Culture & Society, 4(1), 87-106. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs- 2018-0107 · DOI
  35. Tzirides, A. O., Saini, A., Zapata, G. C., Searsmith, D., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Castro, V., Kourkoulou, T., ...., & Kastania, N. P. (2023). Generative AI: Implications and applications for education. ArXiv Preprint: 2305.07605. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.07605 · DOI
  36. Vandewaetere, M., & Clarebout, G. (2014). Advanced technologies for personalized learning, instruction, and performance. In J. Spector, M. Merrill, J. Elen, & M. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 425-437). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_34 · DOI
  37. Woo, J. H., & Choi, H. (2021). Systematic review for AI- based language learning tools. arXiv Preprint: 2111.04455. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2111.04455 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Yağiz, O., & Izadpanah, S. (2013). Language, Culture, Idioms, and Their Relationship with the Foreign Language. Journal of Language Teaching & Research, 4(5), 953-957. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.5.953-957 · DOI
  39. Zhou, G., & Niu, X. (2015). Approaches to language teaching and learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(4), 798-802. https://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0604. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Creely, E.
Affiliations
Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Creely, Edwin
ORCID
Creely, Edwin
Venue
International Journal of Changes in Education
Publisher
Modestum Ltd
Published
2024-08-27
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
158-167
ISSN
3029-133X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.47852/bonviewijce42022495
OpenAlex
W4393392363
Cited by
113
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 8
FWCI
42.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Changes in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Keywords
generative AI, language learning, language teaching, personalized learning, AI-generated content, language standardization, cultural representation, technology dependence, creativity, AI ethics, intellectual property, equity in language education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review