The DOI matches its DataCite record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism
Open accessAbstract
This article summarizes the Quantum Bayesian point of view of quantum mechanics, with special emphasis on the view's outer edges---dubbed QBism. QBism has its roots in personalist Bayesian probability theory, is crucially dependent upon the tools of quantum information theory, and most recently, has set out to investigate whether the physical world might be of a type sketched by some false-started philosophies of 100 years ago (pragmatism, pluralism, nonreductionism, and meliorism). Beyond conceptual issues, work at Perimeter Institute is focused on the hard technical problem of finding a good representation of quantum mechanics purely in terms of probabilities, without amplitudes or Hilbert-space operators. The best candidate representation involves a mysterious entity called a symmetric informationally complete quantum measurement. Contemplation of it gives a way of thinking of the Born Rule as an addition to the rules of probability theory, applicable when an agent considers gambling on the consequences of his interactions with a newly recognized universal capacity: dimension (formerly Hilbert-space dimension). (The word "capacity" should conjure up an image of something like gravitational mass---a body's mass measures its capacity to attract other bodies. With hindsight one can say that the founders of quantum mechanics discovered another universal capacity, "dimension.") The article ends by showing that the egocentric elements in QBism represent no impediment to pursuing quantum cosmology and outlining some directions for future work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“According to these interpretations an electron, for instance, has no position when it is not observed and the state of the electron does not, in general, allow one to predict the specific position one will find when making a position measurement, i.e., no causal account can be given for the precise measurement obtained.”
From The Interface Theory of Perception (2015) · cites this paper as Fuchs 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“both predictions are made by the standard BCopenhagen^interpretation of quantum theory and by more recent interpretations, such as quantum Bayesianism (Allday 2009;Fuchs 2010).”
From The Interface Theory of Perception (2015) · cites this paper as Fuchs 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“But, crucially, the difference can be explained by the two agents’ distinct level of knowledge: Agent F has observed z and hence knows the final spin direction, whereas agent W is ignorant about it5.”
From Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself (2018) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Probability theory the logic of science
Jaynes, E. T., & Bretthorst, G. L. (2003) · Cited by 4,600
Probability Theory: The Logic of Science
Jaynes, E. T. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790423 · Cited by 4,045
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
Peres, A., & Ballentine, L. E. (1995) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17946 · Cited by 2,561
Cartwright, N. D. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167093 · Cited by 2,437
On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton
Verlinde, E. (2011) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2011)029 · Cited by 2,233
Feynman, R. P. (2017) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11068.001.0001 · Cited by 1,905
Bode, B. H., James, W. H., & Perry, R. B. (1912) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2178070 · Cited by 1,833
Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking.
James, W. (1907) · doi:10.1037/10851-000 · Cited by 1,804
The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5546 · Cited by 1,391
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- [13]J. M. Bernardo and A. F. M. Smith, Bayesian Theory (Wiley, Chichester, 1994).
- [14]D. V. Lindley, Understanding Uncertainty , (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2006).
- [15]B. de Finetti, Theory of Probability , 2 volumes, (Wiley, New York, 1990).
- [16]R. von Mises, ' ¨ Uber die gegenw¨ artage Krise der Mechanik,' Die Naturwissenschaften 10 , 25 (1922); translated in, M. St¨ oltzner, 'Vienna Indeterminism II: From Exner's Synthesis to Frank and von Mises,' in Logical Empiricism. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives , edited by P. Parrini, W. Salmon, and M. Salmon, (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 2003), p. 194.
- [23]J. A. Wheeler, 'Bohr, Einstein, and the Strange Lesson of the Quantum,' in Mind in Nature: Nobel Conference XVII, Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, Minnesota , edited by R. Q. Elvee, (Harper & Row, San Francisco, CA, 1982), pp. 1-23, with discussions pp. 2330, 88-89, 112-113, and 148-149.
- [32]G. Zauner, Quantum Designs - Foundations of a NonCommutative Theory of Designs (in German), PhD thesis, University of Vienna, 1999.
- [35]A. J. Scott and M. Grassl, 'SIC-POVMs: A New Computer Study,' arXiv:0910.5784v1 [quant-ph] , (2009). · arXiv
- [55]A. Fine, Shaky Game: Einstein Realism and The Quantum Theory , second edition, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996).
- [62]R. Rorty, Philosophical Papers, Volume 1: Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth , (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991).
- [72]H. J. Folse, 'Niels Bohr's Concept of Reality,' in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1987: The Copenhagen Interpretation 60 Years after the Como Lecture , edited by P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987), pp. 161.
- [91]M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantum-toClassical Transition , (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007).
- C. G. Jung , (Springer, Berlin, 2005).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the reality of the quantum state
Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J., & Rudolph, T. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2309 · Cited by 813
An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics
Fuchs, C. A., Mermin, N. D., & Schack, R. (2014) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.4874855 · Cited by 543
Self-citationQuantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 · Cited by 333
Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.1693 · Cited by 321
Self-citationThe Interface Theory of Perception
Hoffman, D. D., Singh, M., & Prakash, C. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0890-8 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuchs, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Perimeter Institute (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fuchs, Christopher A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2010
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1003.5209
- OpenAlex
- W1521579410
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 34
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- QBism, quantum information, symmetric informationally complete measurements, Born rule, Hilbert space dimension, non-reductionism, pragmatism, pluralism, meliorism, quantum cosmology, quantum foundations, amplitude
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
