The DOI matches its DataCite record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
QBism, the Perimeter of Quantum Bayesianism
Open accessAbstract
This article summarizes the Quantum Bayesian point of view of quantum mechanics, with special emphasis on the view's outer edges---dubbed QBism. QBism has its roots in personalist Bayesian probability theory, is crucially dependent upon the tools of quantum information theory, and most recently, has set out to investigate whether the physical world might be of a type sketched by some false-started philosophies of 100 years ago (pragmatism, pluralism, nonreductionism, and meliorism). Beyond conceptual issues, work at Perimeter Institute is focused on the hard technical problem of finding a good representation of quantum mechanics purely in terms of probabilities, without amplitudes or Hilbert-space operators. The best candidate representation involves a mysterious entity called a symmetric informationally complete quantum measurement. Contemplation of it gives a way of thinking of the Born Rule as an addition to the rules of probability theory, applicable when an agent considers gambling on the consequences of his interactions with a newly recognized universal capacity: dimension (formerly Hilbert-space dimension). (The word "capacity" should conjure up an image of something like gravitational mass---a body's mass measures its capacity to attract other bodies. With hindsight one can say that the founders of quantum mechanics discovered another universal capacity, "dimension.") The article ends by showing that the egocentric elements in QBism represent no impediment to pursuing quantum cosmology and outlining some directions for future work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“According to these interpretations an electron, for instance, has no position when it is not observed and the state of the electron does not, in general, allow one to predict the specific position one will find when making a position measurement, i.e., no causal account can be given for the precise measurement obtained.”
From The Interface Theory of Perception (2015) · cites this paper as Fuchs 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“both predictions are made by the standard BCopenhagen^interpretation of quantum theory and by more recent interpretations, such as quantum Bayesianism (Allday 2009;Fuchs 2010).”
From The Interface Theory of Perception (2015) · cites this paper as Fuchs 2010
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“But, crucially, the difference can be explained by the two agents’ distinct level of knowledge: Agent F has observed z and hence knows the final spin direction, whereas agent W is ignorant about it5.”
From Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself (2018) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantum Computation and Quantum Information
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895
Probability theory the logic of science
Jaynes, E. T., & Bretthorst, G. L. (2003) · Cited by 4,600
Probability Theory: The Logic of Science
Jaynes, E. T. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790423 · Cited by 4,045
Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods
Peres, A., & Ballentine, L. E. (1995) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.17946 · Cited by 2,561
Cartwright, N. D. (1999) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167093 · Cited by 2,437
On the origin of gravity and the laws of Newton
Verlinde, E. (2011) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2011)029 · Cited by 2,233
Feynman, R. P. (2017) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/11068.001.0001 · Cited by 1,905
Bode, B. H., James, W. H., & Perry, R. B. (1912) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2178070 · Cited by 1,833
Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking.
James, W. (1907) · doi:10.1037/10851-000 · Cited by 1,804
The disorder of things: metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science
(1993) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.30-5546 · Cited by 1,391
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- [13]J. M. Bernardo and A. F. M. Smith, Bayesian Theory (Wiley, Chichester, 1994).
- [14]D. V. Lindley, Understanding Uncertainty , (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2006).
- [15]B. de Finetti, Theory of Probability , 2 volumes, (Wiley, New York, 1990).
- [16]R. von Mises, ' ¨ Uber die gegenw¨ artage Krise der Mechanik,' Die Naturwissenschaften 10 , 25 (1922); translated in, M. St¨ oltzner, 'Vienna Indeterminism II: From Exner's Synthesis to Frank and von Mises,' in Logical Empiricism. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives , edited by P. Parrini, W. Salmon, and M. Salmon, (University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, 2003), p. 194.
- [23]J. A. Wheeler, 'Bohr, Einstein, and the Strange Lesson of the Quantum,' in Mind in Nature: Nobel Conference XVII, Gustavus Adolphus College, St. Peter, Minnesota , edited by R. Q. Elvee, (Harper & Row, San Francisco, CA, 1982), pp. 1-23, with discussions pp. 2330, 88-89, 112-113, and 148-149.
- [32]G. Zauner, Quantum Designs - Foundations of a NonCommutative Theory of Designs (in German), PhD thesis, University of Vienna, 1999.
- [35]A. J. Scott and M. Grassl, 'SIC-POVMs: A New Computer Study,' arXiv:0910.5784v1 [quant-ph] , (2009). · arXiv
- [55]A. Fine, Shaky Game: Einstein Realism and The Quantum Theory , second edition, (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1996).
- [62]R. Rorty, Philosophical Papers, Volume 1: Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth , (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991).
- [72]H. J. Folse, 'Niels Bohr's Concept of Reality,' in Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1987: The Copenhagen Interpretation 60 Years after the Como Lecture , edited by P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987), pp. 161.
- [91]M. Schlosshauer, Decoherence and the Quantum-toClassical Transition , (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007).
- C. G. Jung , (Springer, Berlin, 2005).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the reality of the quantum state
Pusey, M. F., Barrett, J., & Rudolph, T. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2309 · Cited by 813
An introduction to QBism with an application to the locality of quantum mechanics
Fuchs, C. A., Mermin, N. D., & Schack, R. (2014) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.4874855 · Cited by 543
Self-citationQuantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself
Frauchiger, D., & Renner, R. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 · Cited by 333
Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2013) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.85.1693 · Cited by 321
Self-citationThe Interface Theory of Perception
Hoffman, D. D., Singh, M., & Prakash, C. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0890-8 · Cited by 329
Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of ψ-Ontology Theorems
Leifer, M. (2014) · Quanta · doi:10.12743/quanta.v3i1.22 · Cited by 361
The SIC Question: History and State of Play
Fuchs, C. A., Hoang, M., & Stacey, B. C. (2017) · Axioms · doi:10.3390/axioms6030021 · Cited by 244
Self-citationQuantum Theory: A Pragmatist Approach
Healey, R. (2012) · The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1093/bjps/axr054 · Cited by 182
Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?
Laloë, F. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108569361 · Cited by 171
Hardy, L. (2012) · International Journal of Modern Physics B · doi:10.1142/s0217979213450124 · Cited by 151
Distinct Quantum States Can Be Compatible with a Single State of Reality
Lewis, P. G., Jennings, D. H., Barrett, J., & Rudolph, T. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.150404 · Cited by 149
Universal darwinism as a process of bayesian inference
Campbell, J. O. (2016) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2016.00049 · Cited by 140
Measurements on the reality of the wavefunction
Ringbauer, M., Duffus, B., Branciard, C., Cavalcanti, E. G., White, A. G., & Fedrizzi, A. (2015) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys3233 · Cited by 132
Reformulating and Reconstructing Quantum TheoryPreprint
Hardy, L. (2011) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1104.2066 · Cited by 238
QBism and the Greeks: why a quantum state does not represent an element of physical reality
Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2014) · Physica Scripta · doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/1/015104 · Cited by 123
Self-citationHoffman, D. D., & Prakash, C. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00577 · Cited by 103
Respecting One’s Fellow: QBism’s Analysis of Wigner’s Friend
DeBrota, J. B., Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2020) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-020-00369-x · Cited by 107
Self-citationA Quintet of Quandaries: Five No-Go Theorems for Relational Quantum Mechanics
Pienaar, J. (2021) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-021-00500-6 · Cited by 96
Interpretations of Quantum Theory: A Map of Madness
Cabello, A. (2017) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316494233.009 · Cited by 116
On Formalisms and Interpretations
Baumann, V., & Wolf, S. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-10-15-99 · Cited by 88
A no-go theorem for the persistent reality of Wigner’s friend’s perception
Guérin, P. A., Baumann, V., Santo, F. D., & Brukner, Č. (2021) · Communications Physics · doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00589-1 · Cited by 82
Notwithstanding Bohr, the Reasons for QBismPreprint
Fuchs, C. A. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.03483 · Cited by 108
Self-citationA Kochen–Specker inequality from a SIC
Bengtsson, I., Blanchfield, K., & Cabello, A. (2011) · Physics Letters A · doi:10.1016/j.physleta.2011.12.011 · Cited by 65
QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero's HandbookPreprint
Fuchs, C. A., & Stacey, B. C. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.07308 · Cited by 61
Self-citationThe Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Barrett, J. A. (2019) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198844686.001.0001 · Cited by 62
Introducing the Qplex: a novel arena for quantum theory
Appleby, M., Fuchs, C. A., Stacey, B. C., & Zhu, H. (2017) · The European Physical Journal D · doi:10.1140/epjd/e2017-80024-y · Cited by 67
Self-citationAgainst Radical Quantum Ontologies
Emery, N. (2017) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12444 · Cited by 52
The Interface Theory of Perception
Hoffman, D. D. (2016) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721416639702 · Cited by 57
Wigner’s Friend as a Rational Agent
Baumann, V., & Brukner, Č. (2020) · Jerusalem studies in philosophy and history of science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-34316-3_4 · Cited by 52
Is the Quantum State Real? An Extended Review of -ontology TheoremsPreprint
Leifer, M., Landsman, K., Colbeck, R., & Rudolph, T. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 51
Quasiprobability Representations of Quantum Mechanics with Minimal Negativity
Zhu, H. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.120404 · Cited by 49
QBism and the limits of scientific realism
Glick, D. (2021) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-021-00366-5 · Cited by 49
QBism and Relational Quantum Mechanics compared
Pienaar, J. (2021) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-021-00501-5 · Cited by 58
Fattal, A. (2016) · Transition · doi:10.2979/transition.121.1.06 · Cited by 43
Regulative development as a model for origin of life and artificial life studies
Fields, C., & Levin, M. G. (2023) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104927 · Cited by 43
Is the life-world reduction sufficient in quantum physics?
Bitbol, M. (2020) · Continental Philosophy Review · doi:10.1007/s11007-020-09515-8 · Cited by 41
Group theoretic, lie algebraic and Jordan algebraic formulations of the sic existence problem
Appleby, D. M., Fuchs, C. A., & Zhu, H. (2015) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.5555/2685188.2685193 · Cited by 41
Self-citationOperational General Relativity: Possibilistic, Probabilistic, and QuantumPreprint
Hardy, L. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1608.06940 · Cited by 76
Adlam, E. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03989-0 · Cited by 38
A Phenomenological Approach to Quantum Mechanics
French, S. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198897958.001.0001 · Cited by 37
Thermodynamical cost of some interpretations of quantum theory
Cabello, A., Gu, M., Gühne, O., Larsson, J.-Å., & Wiesner, K. (2016) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.94.052127 · Cited by 38
Quantum Probability Theory and the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Fröhlich, J., & Schubnel, B. (2015) · Lecture Notes in Physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-46422-9_7 · Cited by 36
Thermodynamics and the structure of quantum theory
Krumm, M., Barnum, H., Barrett, J., & Müller, M. P. (2017) · Institutional Repository of Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz Universität Hannover) · doi:10.15488/1665 · Cited by 33
Group theoretic, Lie algebraic and Jordan algebraic formulations of the SIC existence problem
Appleby, D. M., Fuchs, C. A., & Zhu, H. (2015) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic15.1-2-5 · Cited by 33
Self-citationVon Neumann was not a Quantum Bayesian
Stacey, B. C. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2015.0235 · Cited by 35
If Physics Is an Information Science, What Is an Observer?
Fields, C. (2012) · Cited by 30
Bayesian Conditioning, the Reflection Principle, and Quantum DecoherencePreprint
Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2012) · Cited by 31
Self-citationEquivalence of the Symbol Grounding and Quantum System Identification Problems
Fields, C. (2014) · Information · doi:10.3390/info5010172 · Cited by 26
In defence of non-ontic accounts of quantum states
Friederich, S. (2013) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics · doi:10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.01.002 · Cited by 26
From stabilizer states to SIC-POVM fiducial states
Feng, L., & Luo, S. (2022) · Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1134/s004057792212008x · Cited by 26
Generalized Probability Measures and the Framework of Effects
Demopoulos, W. (2011) · The frontiers collection · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21329-8_13 · Cited by 24
Earman, J. (2019) · The Monist · doi:10.1093/monist/onz017 · Cited by 24
Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language
Drummond, B. (2019) · Open Physics · doi:10.1515/phys-2019-0045 · Cited by 28
Ideas Abandoned en Route to QBismPreprint
Stacey, B. C. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.07386 · Cited by 24
Natural Selection and Shape Perception
Singh, M., & Hoffman, D. D. (2013) · Advances in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-5195-1_12 · Cited by 23
QBism from a Phenomenological Point of View: Husserl and QBism
de la Tremblaye, L. (2020) · Synthese Library/Synthese library · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-46973-3_12 · Cited by 23
Sporadic SICs and the Normed Division Algebras
Stacey, B. C. (2017) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-017-0087-2 · Cited by 25
Some Consequences of the Thermodynamic Cost of System Identification
Fields, C. (2018) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e20100797 · Cited by 21
Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
Adlam, E. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108885515 · Cited by 24
Interview with physicist Christopher Fuchs
Crease, R. P., & Sares, J. (2021) · Continental Philosophy Review · doi:10.1007/s11007-020-09525-6 · Cited by 22
Quantum Decoherence in a Pragmatist View: Dispelling Feynman’s Mystery
Healey, R. (2012) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-012-9681-5 · Cited by 19
A model-theoretic interpretation of environment-induced superselection
Fields, C. (2012) · International Journal of General Systems · doi:10.1080/03081079.2012.707197 · Cited by 19
The monomial representations of the Clifford group
Appleby, D. M., Bengtsson, I., BRIERLEY, S. D., Grassl, M., Gross, D., & Larsson, J.-Å. (2012) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic12.5-6-3 · Cited by 19
Drossel, B. (2019) · Quantum Studies Mathematics and Foundations · doi:10.1007/s40509-019-00208-3 · Cited by 18
Negativity Bounds for Weyl–Heisenberg Quasiprobability Representations
DeBrota, J. B., & Fuchs, C. A. (2017) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-017-0098-z · Cited by 18
Self-citationThe Self-Simulation Hypothesis Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics
Irwin, K., Amaral, M. M., & Chester, D. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22020247 · Cited by 21
A quadrilemma for theories of consciousness
List, C. (2024) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqae053 · Cited by 17
Nonlocality Versus Modified Realism
Hervé Zwirn, C. (2019) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-019-00314-7 · Cited by 21
Galois automorphisms of a symmetric measurement
(2013) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic13.7-8-8 · Cited by 17
Allori, V. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03332-z · Cited by 17
Esfeld, M. (2014) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0549-4 · Cited by 17
Towards Better Understanding QBism
Khrennikov, A. Y. (2017) · Foundations of Science · doi:10.1007/s10699-017-9524-0 · Cited by 17
The ontology of quantum field theory: Structural realism vindicated?
Glick, D. (2016) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.06.007 · Cited by 15
Ferrie, C. (2014) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 19
Geometric and Information-Theoretic Properties of the Hoggar LinesPreprint
Stacey, B. C. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.03075 · Cited by 15
Systems of imprimitivity for the Clifford group
Appleby, D. M., Bengtsson, I., Brierley, S., Ericsson, Å., Grassl, M., & Larsson, J.-Å. (2014) · National University of Singapore · Cited by 14
Zhu, H. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.032309 · Cited by 14
The Roles Ascribed to Consciousness in Quantum Physics
Bitbol, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197501665.003.0012 · Cited by 15
Perspectives on the Formalism of Quantum Theory
Ududec, C. (2012) · Cited by 14
On the ollivier–poulin–zurek definition of objectivityPreprint
Fields, C. (2016) · Cited by 15
Marchildon, . (2015) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-015-9875-8 · Cited by 12
Why Current Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics are DeficientPreprint
Tammaro, E. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1408.2093 · Cited by 14
The interface theory of perception: the future of the science of the mind?
Hickok, G. S. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0930-4 · Cited by 11
Probing the interface theory of perception: Reply to commentaries
Hoffman, D. D., Singh, M., & Prakash, C. (2015) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0931-3 · Cited by 11
Measurement and Classical Regime in Quantum Mechanics
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195392043.013.0013 · Cited by 10
External Observer Reflections on QBism, Its Possible Modifications, and Novel Applications
Khrennikov, A. Y. (2018) · STEAM-H: Science, Technology, Engineering, Agriculture, Mathematics & Health · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-74971-6_9 · Cited by 10
On Reconstructing Parts of Quantum Theory from Two Related Maximal Conceptual Variables
Helland, I. S. (2022) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/s10773-022-05047-4 · Cited by 10
Systems of Imprimitivity for the Clifford group
Appleby, D. M., Bengtsson, I., BRIERLEY, S. D., Ericsson, A., Grassl, M., & Larsson, J.-Å. (2014) · Quantum Information and Computation · doi:10.26421/qic14.3-4-9 · Cited by 10
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04382-1_27 · Cited by 9
The free energy principle induces intracellular compartmentalization
Fields, C. (2024) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2024.150070 · Cited by 8
Equilibration and thermalization in quantum systems
Gogolin, C. (2014) · Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver · doi:10.13140/2.1.1636.4485 · Cited by 11
QBism: A Critical AppraisalPreprint
Mohrhoff, U. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3312 · Cited by 10
Implementation of Classical Communication in a Quantum World
Fields, C. (2012) · Information · doi:10.3390/info3040809 · Cited by 8
Quantum Measurement and the Paulian IdeaPreprint
Fuchs, C. A., & Schack, R. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.4209 · Cited by 7
Self-citationFano, V. (2019) · dialectica · doi:10.1111/1746-8361.12259 · Cited by 7
Helland, I. S. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81923-1_5 · Cited by 6
Phenomenology, Perspectivalism and (Quantum) Physics
French, S. (2024) · Foundations of Physics · doi:10.1007/s10701-024-00769-3 · Cited by 8
A whole box of Pandoras: systems, boundaries and free will in quantum theory1
Fields, C. (2013) · Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/0952813x.2013.782981 · Cited by 7
Statistical properties of qutrit in probability representation of quantum mechanics
Avanesov, A. S., & Man’ko, V. I. (2019) · Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.121898 · Cited by 6
Why protective measurement does not establish the reality of the quantum state
Combes, J., Ferrie, C., Leifer, M., & Pusey, M. F. (2017) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Fuchs, C. A.
- Affiliations
- Perimeter Institute (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Fuchs, Christopher A.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2010
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1003.5209
- OpenAlex
- W1521579410
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 34
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Keywords
- QBism, quantum information, symmetric informationally complete measurements, Born rule, Hilbert space dimension, non-reductionism, pragmatism, pluralism, meliorism, quantum cosmology, quantum foundations, amplitude
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review