The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chameleons in imagined conversations: A new approach to understanding coordination of linguistic style in dialogs
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue.
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x04000056 · Cited by 2,678
Syntactic persistence in language production
Bock, J. K. (1986) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 · Cited by 1,911
Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text
Mairesse, F., Walker, M. A., Mehl, M. R., & Moore, R. K. (2007) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.2349 · Cited by 1,046
Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1023/a:1025389814290 · Cited by 960
Language style matching in writing: synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry.
Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020386 · Cited by 380
Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? an experimental test of similarity-attraction
Nass, C., & Lee, K. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/332040.332452 · Cited by 242
Applied Bayesian and Classical Inference
Mosteller, F., & Wallace, D. L. (1984) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5256-6 · Cited by 195
Cited by
A Literature Survey of Recent Advances in Chatbots
Caldarini, G., Jaf, S., & McGarry, K. (2022) · Information · doi:10.3390/info13010041 · Cited by 470
Deep Reinforcement Learning for Sequence-to-Sequence Models
Keneshloo, Y., Shi, T., Ramakrishnan, N., & Reddy, C. K. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2929141 · Cited by 230
Mental Health Support and its Relationship to Linguistic Accommodation in Online Communities
Sharma, E., & De Choudhury, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3174215 · Cited by 156
Way Off-Policy Batch Deep Reinforcement Learning of Implicit Human Preferences in Dialog
Jaques, N., Ghandeharioun, A., Shen, J. H., Ferguson, C., Lapedriza, A., Jones, N., Gu, S., & Picard, R. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.00456 · Cited by 126
Auditing Data Provenance in Text-Generation Models
Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2019) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3292500.3330885 · Cited by 103
SODA: Million-scale Dialogue Distillation with Social Commonsense Contextualization
Kim, H., Hessel, J., Jiang, L., West, P., Lu, X., Yu, Y., Zhou, P., Bras, R., Alikhani, M., Kim, G., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.799 · Cited by 63
Evaluating the Evaluation of Diversity in Natural Language Generation
Tevet, G., & Berant, J. (2021) · Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.25 · Cited by 52
Improvised Theatre Alongside Artificial Intelligences
Mathewson, K., & Mirowski, P. (2017) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment · doi:10.1609/aiide.v13i1.12926 · Cited by 31
Extracting Latent Steering Vectors from Pretrained Language Models
Subramani, N., Suresh, N., & Peters, M. E. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.05124 · Cited by 31
Yi, S., Goel, R., Khatri, C., Cervone, A., Chung, T., Hedayatnia, B., Venkatesh, A., Gabriel, R., & Hakkani-Tur, D. (2019) · Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Natural Language Generation · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-8608 · Cited by 26
Love in Lyrics: An Exploration of Supporting Textual Manifestation of Affection in Social Messaging
Kim, T., Lee, J. S., Peng, Z., & Ma, X. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359181 · Cited by 24
Collaborative Storytelling with Human Actors and AI Narrators
Branch, B., Mirowski, P., & Mathewson, K. W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.14728 · Cited by 11
Towards Improving Predictive AAC using Crowdsourced Dialogues and Partner Context
Vertanen, K. (2017) · Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility · doi:10.1145/3132525.3134814 · Cited by 10
HANSEN: Human and AI Spoken Text Benchmark for Authorship Analysis
Tripto, N., Uchendu, A., Le, T., Setzu, M., Giannotti, F., & Lee, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.916 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C., & Lee, L.
- Venue
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Publisher
- Cornell University
- Published
- 2011-06-15
- Pages
- 76-87
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 1106.3077
- OpenAlex
- W2125320996
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 7
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
